Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;41(11):1013-1022.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9.

Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction

Affiliations
Review

Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction

Ylenia Ingrasciotta et al. Drug Saf. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

In recent years, marketing of highly innovative and costly biologics improved the management of high-burden diseases such as autoimmune diseases, cancers, and chronic renal failure. Several widely prescribed biologics have recently lost or will shortly lose their patents, thus opening avenues to the marketing of a growing number of biosimilars worldwide, which are products similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to already licensed reference products, thus allowing for potential savings in pharmaceutical expenditure. Numerous debates about the interchangeability between biosimilars and reference products are still ongoing, owing to concerns about potential immunogenicity raised by switching, which may cause a lack of effect and toxicity. Patients successfully treated with biologic therapy may theoretically receive biosimilars to contain costs, if reference product and related biosimilar are judged as interchangeable. However, the positions of regulatory agencies on the interchangeability and automatic substitution of biologics with biosimilars are very different. The benefit-risk profile of biosimilars has been often questioned by clinicians owing to the limited amount of pre-marketing information on clinical efficacy and safety, despite biosimilarity being based on a comparability exercise with the reference product to gain the biosimilar approval. Nevertheless, after more than 10 years of marketing from the first biosimilar approval in Europe, no proof of differences in terms of the safety profile of biosimilars and originators has been reported. In this context, post-marketing evaluation of both biologics and biosimilars safety profiles through analyses from spontaneous reporting databases and claims databases is crucial. An important issue for the pharmacovigilance of biologics concerns the traceability, indicating the brand name and batch number in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports, but this requirement is not frequently addressed. This review aims to provide an overview of the characteristics and potential challenges in the safety profile assessment of biologics with a focus on the post-marketing setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BioDrugs. 2015 Aug;29(4):275-84 - PubMed
    1. Blood. 2014 Jul 10;124(2):188-95 - PubMed
    1. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2016 Mar 16;28(1):45-60 - PubMed
    1. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012 Nov;12(11):1473-85 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 7;355(10):1018-28 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources