Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;29(2):303-314.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9783-9.

Development and Implementation of a Mental Health Work Rehabilitation Program: Results of a Developmental Evaluation

Affiliations

Development and Implementation of a Mental Health Work Rehabilitation Program: Results of a Developmental Evaluation

Chantal Sylvain et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose Long-term work disability due to common mental disorders (CMDs) is a growing problem. Yet optimal interventions remain unclear and little is known about implementation challenges in everyday practice. This study aimed to support and evaluate, in real time, the development and implementation of a work rehabilitation program (WRP) designed to promote post-CMD return-to-work (RTW). Methods A 2-year developmental evaluation was performed using a participatory approach. At program outset, the researchers held five work meetings to revise the program's logic model and discuss its underlying change theory with clinicians. Data collection tools used throughout the study period were structured charts of activities conducted with workers (n = 41); in-depth interviews with program clinicians and managers (n = 9); and participant observation during work meetings. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using a processual approach. Results Three types of activity were developed and implemented: individual and group interventions targeting workers, and joint activities targeting partners (physicians, employers, others). While worker-targeted activities were generally implemented as planned, joint activities were sporadic. Analysis of the implementation process revealed five challenges faced by clinicians. Determinants included clinicians, host organization, sociopolitical context and resources provided by the evaluation. Conclusion The program studied is original in that it is based on the best available scientific knowledge, yet adapted to contextual particularities. The identified implementation challenges highlight the need for greater importance to be placed on the external, non-program context to ensure sustainable implementation in everyday practice.

Keywords: Implementation; Mental disorders; Program development; Return to work; Sick leave.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;43(7):616-22 - PubMed
    1. Healthc Policy. 2005 Sep;1(1):55-71 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006955 - PubMed
    1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Nov 30;10:147 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Mar;22(1):127-40 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources