Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):970-976.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0991.

Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer

Sheraz R Markar  1 , Tom Wiggins  1 , Stefan Antonowicz  1 , Sung-Tong Chin  1 , Andrea Romano  1 , Konstantin Nikolic  2 , Benjamin Evans  2 , David Cunningham  3 , Muntzer Mughal  4 , Jesper Lagergren  5   6 , George B Hanna  1
Affiliations

Assessment of a Noninvasive Exhaled Breath Test for the Diagnosis of Oesophagogastric Cancer

Sheraz R Markar et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Early esophagogastric cancer (OGC) stage presents with nonspecific symptoms.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of a breath test for the diagnosis of OGC in a multicenter validation study.

Design, setting, and participants: Patient recruitment for this diagnostic validation study was conducted at 3 London hospital sites, with breath samples returned to a central laboratory for selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) analysis. Based on a 1:1 cancer:control ratio, and maintaining a sensitivity and specificity of 80%, the sample size required was 325 patients. All patients with cancer were on a curative treatment pathway, and patients were recruited consecutively. Among the 335 patients included; 172 were in the control group and 163 had OGC.

Interventions: Breath samples were collected using secure 500-mL steel breath bags and analyzed by SIFT-MS. Quality assurance measures included sampling room air, training all researchers in breath sampling, regular instrument calibration, and unambiguous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identification by gas chromatography mass spectrometry.

Main outcomes and measures: The risk of cancer was identified based on a previously generated 5-VOCs model and compared with histopathology-proven diagnosis.

Results: Patients in the OGC group were older (median [IQR] age 68 [60-75] vs 55 [41-69] years) and had a greater proportion of men (134 [82.2%]) vs women (81 [47.4%]) compared with the control group. Of the 163 patients with OGC, 123 (69%) had tumor stage T3/4, and 106 (65%) had nodal metastasis on clinical staging. The predictive probabilities generated by this 5-VOCs diagnostic model were used to generate a receiver operator characteristic curve, with good diagnostic accuracy, area under the curve of 0.85. This translated to a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81% for the diagnosis of OGC.

Conclusions and relevance: This study shows the potential of breath analysis in noninvasive diagnosis of OGC in the clinical setting. The next step is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the test among the intended population in primary care where the test will be applied.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. ROC Curve for the 5-VOC Breath Model in the Diagnosis of Esophagogastric Cancer in the Multicenter Clinical Triala
Abbreviations: ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; VOC, volatile organic compounds. aArea under the curve of 0.85 (SD, 0.02).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bodger K, Eastwood PG, Manning SI, Daly MJ, Heatley RV. Dyspepsia workload in urban general practice and implications of the British Society of Gastroenterology Dyspepsia guidelines (1996). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(4):413-420. - PubMed
    1. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit 2016. http://www.hqip.org.uk/public/cms/253/625/19/633/NationalOGCAuditReport2.... Accessed September 11, 2016.
    1. National Initiative for Health and Care Excellence NICE guidelines for suspected cancer. 2015; (June). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/.
    1. Shawihdi M, Thompson E, Kapoor N, et al. . Variation in gastroscopy rate in English general practice and outcome for oesophagogastric cancer: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. Gut. 2014;63(2):250-261. - PubMed
    1. Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Jemal S, et al. . Emergency presentation of esophagogastric cancer: predictors and long-term prognosis. Ann Surg. 2017;267(4):711-715. - PubMed