Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):e180798.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0798. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Speed of Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors of Programmed Cell Death 1 Protein and Comparison of Patient Ages in Clinical Practice vs Pivotal Clinical Trials

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Speed of Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors of Programmed Cell Death 1 Protein and Comparison of Patient Ages in Clinical Practice vs Pivotal Clinical Trials

Jeremy M O'Connor et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is increasing its pace of approvals for novel cancer therapeutics, including for immune checkpoint inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 protein (anti-PD-1 agents). However, little is known about how quickly anti-PD-1 agents agents reach eligible patients in practice or whether such patients differ from those studied in clinical trials that lead to FDA approval (pivotal clinical trials).

Objectives: To assess the speed with which anti-PD-1 agents agents reached eligible patients in practice and to compare the ages of patients treated in clinical practice with the ages of those treated in pivotal clinical trials.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study, performed from January 1, 2011, through August 31, 2016, included patients from the Flatiron Health Network who were eligible for anti-PD-1 agents treatment of selected cancer types, which included melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Main outcomes and measures: Cumulative proportions of eligible patients receiving anti-PD-1 agents treatment and their age distributions.

Results: The study identified 3089 patients who were eligible for anti-PD-1 agents treatment (median age, 66 [interquartile range, 56-75] years for patients with melanoma, 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years for patients with RCC, and 67 [interquartile range, 59-74] years for patients with NSCLC; 1742 male [56.4%] and 1347 [43.6%] female; 2066 [66.9%] white). Of these patients, 2123 (68.7%) received anti-PD-1 agents treatment, including 439 eligible patients with melanoma (79.1%), 1417 eligible patients with NSCLC (65.6%), and 267 eligible patients with RCC (71.2%). Within 4 months after FDA approval, greater than 60% of eligible patients in each cohort had received anti-PD-1 agents treatment. Overall, similar proportions of older and younger patients received anti-PD-1 agents treatment during the first 9 months after FDA approval. However, there were significant differences in age between clinical trial participants and patients receiving anti-PD-1 agents treatment in clinical practice, with more patients being older than 65 years in clinical practice (range, 327 of 1365 [60.6%] to 46 of 72 [63.9%]) than in pivotal clinical trials (range, 38 of 120 [31.7%] to 223 of 544 [41.0%]; all P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Anti-PD-1 agents rapidly reached patients in clinical practice, and patients treated in clinical practice differed significantly from patients treated in pivotal clinical trials. Future actions are needed to ensure that rapid adoption occurs on the basis of representative trial evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Fessele, Steiner, Seidl-Rathkopf, Carson, Nussbaum, and Abernethy reported being full-time employees of Flatiron Health during the conduct of this study. Flatiron Health is a cancer-focused health technology company in New York, New York, and the source of study data. Dr Ross reported receiving support for research from Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic Inc, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Dr Chiang reported receiving support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, and AbbVie, with consulting or advisory roles for AstraZeneca and AbbVie. Dr Abernethy reported consulting for Roche/Genentech for less than $5000 and consulting for Bristol-Myers Squibb more than 2 years ago for less than $10 000 and serving on the board of directors for athenahealth and as an adviser for SignalPath. Dr Gross reported receiving support for research from 21st Century Oncology, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic Inc, and Pfizer. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cumulative Uptake of Treatment With Anti–PD-1 Agents Among Eligible Patients
Patients who were eligible for or treated with an anti–PD-1 agents agent remained in the numerator or denominator for the rest of the study period. Because some patients received both nivolumab and pembrolizumab, total monthly percentages may exceed 100%. Vertical dashed lines identify the date of initial US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of each agent. Dates of subsequent FDA approvals are given in eTable 1 in the Supplement. PD-1 indicates programmed cell death 1 protein.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Proportional Uptake of Treatment With Anti–PD-1 Agents Among Eligible Patients by Age
Vertical dashed lines identify the date of initial US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of each agent. Dates of subsequent FDA approvals are given in eTable 1 in the Supplement. PD-1 indicates programmed cell death 1 protein.

References

    1. Davidson NE, Armstrong SA, Coussens LM, et al. ; American Association for Cancer Research . AACR Cancer Progress Report 2016. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(19)(suppl):-. - PubMed
    1. Singer DS, Jacks T, Jaffee E. A U.S. “Cancer Moonshot” to accelerate cancer research. Science. 2016;353(6304):1105-1106. - PubMed
    1. Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. The 21st Century Cures Act: will it take us back in time? N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2473-2475. - PubMed
    1. Downing NS, Aminawung JA, Shah ND, Braunstein JB, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Regulatory review of novel therapeutics: comparison of three regulatory agencies. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2284-2293. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510-520. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms