Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2018 May 25;17(1):66.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0781-5.

Community health workers and accountability: reflections from an international "think-in"

Affiliations
Editorial

Community health workers and accountability: reflections from an international "think-in"

Marta Schaaf et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are frequently put forward as a remedy for lack of health system capacity, including challenges associated with health service coverage and with low community engagement in the health system, and expected to enhance or embody health system accountability. During a 'think in', held in June of 2017, a diverse group of practitioners and researchers discussed the topic of CHWs and their possible roles in a larger "accountability ecosystem." This jointly authored commentary resulted from our deliberations. While CHWs are often conceptualized as cogs in a mechanistic health delivery system, at the end of the day, CHWs are people embedded in families, communities, and the health system. CHWs' social position and professional role influence how they are treated and trusted by the health sector and by community members, as well as when, where, and how they can exercise agency and promote accountability. To that end, we put forward several propositions for further conceptual development and research related to the question of CHWs and accountability.

Keywords: Accountability; Community health workers; Equity; Global health; Power relations; Universal health coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Werner D. The village health worker: lackey or liberator? World Health Forum. 1981;2(1):46–68. - PubMed
    1. Schneider H, Okello D, Lehmann U. The global pendulum swing towards community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of trends, geographical distribution and programmatic orientations, 2005 to 2014. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14(65). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schedler A. Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler A, Diamond L, Plattner MF, editors. The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder, CO, USA and London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc; 1999. pp. 13–28.
    1. Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):371–379. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fox J, Aceron J. Doing accountability differently: a proposal for the vertical integration of civil society monitoring and advocacy (U4 issue paper 4) Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute; 2016.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources