Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov:369:56-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 4.

Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition

Affiliations
Review

Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition

Kristin J Van Engen et al. Hear Res. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Although human speech recognition is often experienced as relatively effortless, a number of common challenges can render the task more difficult. Such challenges may originate in talkers (e.g., unfamiliar accents, varying speech styles), the environment (e.g. noise), or in listeners themselves (e.g., hearing loss, aging, different native language backgrounds). Each of these challenges can reduce the intelligibility of spoken language, but even when intelligibility remains high, they can place greater processing demands on listeners. Noisy conditions, for example, can lead to poorer recall for speech, even when it has been correctly understood. Speech intelligibility measures, memory tasks, and subjective reports of listener difficulty all provide critical information about the effects of such challenges on speech recognition. Eye tracking and pupillometry complement these methods by providing objective physiological measures of online cognitive processing during listening. Eye tracking records the moment-to-moment direction of listeners' visual attention, which is closely time-locked to unfolding speech signals, and pupillometry measures the moment-to-moment size of listeners' pupils, which dilate in response to increased cognitive load. In this paper, we review the uses of these two methods for studying challenges to speech recognition.

Keywords: Eye tracking; Listening effort; Pupillometry; Speech recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Sample array for the visual world paradigm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allopenna PD, Magnuson JS, Tanenhaus MK, 1998. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: evidence for continuous mapping models. J. Mem. Lang 38 (4), 419–439. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558. - DOI
    1. Alnaes D, Sneve MH, Espeseth T, van de Pavert SHP, Laeng B, 2014. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and locus coeruleus. J. Vis 14, 1–20. - PubMed
    1. Arnold JE, Eisenband JG, Brown-Schmidt S, Trueswell JC, 2000. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eye tracking. Cognition 76 (1), B13–B26. - PubMed
    1. Arnold JE, Novick JM, Brown-Schmidt S, Eisenband JG, Trueswell J, 2001. Knowing the difference between girls and boys: the use of gender during online pronoun comprehension in young children. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual boston university Conference on Language Development, pp. 59–69.
    1. Arnold JE, Fagnano M, Tanenhaus MK, 2003. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. J. Psycholinguist. Res 32 (1), 25–36. - PubMed

Publication types