Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;43(9):1900-1907.
doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0084-y. Epub 2018 May 3.

(2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine is not essential for the antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine in mice

Affiliations

(2R,6R)-Hydroxynorketamine is not essential for the antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine in mice

Jun-Ichi Yamaguchi et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

(R,S)-Ketamine has rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in depressed patients. Although the metabolism of (R,S)-ketamine to (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine (HNK), a metabolite of (R)-ketamine, has been reported to be essential for its antidepressant effects, recent evidence suggests otherwise. The present study investigated the role of the metabolism of (R)-ketamine to (2 R,6 R)-HNK in the antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine. Antidepressant effects were evaluated using the forced swimming test in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation model of mice and the tail suspension test in naive mice. To prevent the metabolism of (R)-ketamine to (2 R,6 R)-HNK, mice were pretreated with cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors. The concentrations of (R)-ketamine, (R)-norketamine, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK in plasma, brain, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were determined using enantioselective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The concentrations of (R)-norketamine and (2 R,6 R)-HNK in plasma, brain, and CSF samples after administration of (R)-norketamine (10 mg/kg) and (2 R,6 R)-HNK (10 mg/kg), respectively, were higher than those generated after administration of (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg). Nonetheless, while (R)-ketamine attenuated, neither (R)-norketamine nor (2 R,6 R)-HNK significantly altered immobility times of LPS-treated mice. Treatment with CYP inhibitors prior to administration of (R)-ketamine increased the plasma levels of (R)-ketamine, while generation of (2 R,6 R)-HNK was almost completely blocked. (R)-Ketamine exerted the antidepressant effects at a lower dose in the presence of CYP inhibitors than in their absence, which is consistent with exposure levels of (R)-ketamine but not (2 R,6 R)-HNK. These results indicate that metabolism to (2 R,6 R)-HNK is not necessary for the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine and that unmetabolized (R)-ketamine itself may be responsible for its antidepressant actions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.Y. was supported by a Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. K.H. is an inventor named on a filed patent application for “The use of R-ketamine in the treatment of psychiatric diseases” by Chiba University. K.H. has received research support from Dainippon Sumitomo, Mochida, Otsuka, and Taisho. J.Y., H.T., H.K., A.M.Y., and S.C. are employees of Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Y.Q. declares no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effects of (R)-ketamine ((R)-Ket), (R)-norketamine ((R)-NK), and (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine ((2 R,6 R)-HNK) in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation model and the pharmacokinetic profiles of these compounds. a Experimental schedules for the evaluation of the pharmacological effects of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK. The compounds were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). b Effects of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK on the LPS-induced increase in the immobility time during the forced swimming test (FST; one-way analysis of variance, F4,35 = 5.553, P = 0.001). c Effects of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK in the locomotion test (LMT; F4,35 = 0.356, P = 0.838). b, c Data are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8/group). **P < 0.01 compared with Saline, ##P < 0.01 compared with saline–LPS treatment. d, h Experimental schedules for the pharmacokinetic studies following the intraperitoneal administration of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, or (2 R,6 R)-HNK. eg Plasma concentration–time profiles after the administration of (R)-Ket (E), (R)-NK (F), or (2 R,6 R)-HNK (g). Blood was collected sequentially at 5, 15, and 30 min and at 1, 2, and 3 h from the tail vein of each individual mouse. i, j Concentrations of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK in the brain (i) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; j) at the time points ((a) 5 min, (b) 15 min) corresponding to their plasma tmax (time at the plasma maximum concentration). eg, i The plasma and brain levels are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). j Each CSF level represents a value derived from a pooled CSF specimen collected from three mice
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of cytochrome P450 inhibitors (CYPI) on the antidepressant effects and pharmacokinetic profiles of (R)-ketamine ((R)-Ket) in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation model. a Experimental schedules for the pharmacokinetic studies following the intraperitoneal administration of (R)-Ket. bd Plasma concentration–time profiles of (R)-Ket, (R)-norketamine ((R)-NK), and (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine ((2 R,6 R)-HNK) after the administration of (R)-Ket (3 mg/kg) without (b) and with (c) CYPI pretreatment, and (R)-Ket (10 mg/kg) without CYPI pretreatment (d). Following the administration of (R)-Ket, blood was collected sequentially at 5, 15, and 30 min and at 1, 2, and 3 h from the tail vein of each individual mouse. e, f Effect of CYPI pretreatment on the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax; e) and the area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3h; F) of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK. Pretreatment with CYPI completely blocked (2 R,6 R)-HNK formation to below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ; < 3 ng/mL); therefore, the AUC0–3h was not calculable (NC) because of the BLQ of the analyte. bf Data are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). g Experimental schedules for the evaluation of the pharmacological effects of (R)-Ket. h Effects of (R)-Ket on the LPS-increased immobility in the forced swimming test (FST) in the presence or absence of CYPI (one-way analysis of variance, F5,42 = 4.707, P = 0.002). i Effects of (R)-Ket on the locomotion test in the presence or absence of CYPI (LMT; F5,42 = 0.804, P = 0.553). h, i Data are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8/group). **P < 0.01 compared with saline, ##P < 0.01 compared with saline–LPS treatment, @@P < 0.01 compared with CYPI/(R)-ketamine (3 mg/kg)-LPS treatment, $$P < 0.01 compared with saline/(R)-ketamine (3 mg/kg)-LPS treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of cytochrome P450 inhibitors (CYPI) on the antidepressant effects and pharmacokinetic profiles of (R)-ketamine ((R)-Ket) in naive ICR mice. a Experimental schedules for the pharmacokinetic studies following the intraperitoneal administration of (R)-Ket. bd Plasma concentration–time profiles of (R)-Ket, (R)-norketamine ((R)-NK), and (2 R,6 R)-hydroxynorketamine ((2 R,6 R)-HNK) after the administration of (R)-Ket (10 mg/kg, i.p.) without (b) and with (c) CYPI pretreatment and (R)-Ket (30 mg/kg, i.p.) without CYPI pretreatment (d). Following the (R)-Ket administration, blood was collected sequentially at 5, 15, and 30 min and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h from the tail vein of each individual mouse. e, f Effect of the CYPI pretreatment on the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax; e) and the area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUC0-∞; f) of (R)-Ket, (R)-NK, and (2 R,6 R)-HNK. Pretreatment with CYPI markedly decreased the (2 R,6 R)-HNK levels to near the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 3 ng/mL). bf Data are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). g Experimental schedule for the evaluation of the pharmacological effects of (R)-Ket. h Effects of (R)-Ket on the immobility in the tail suspension test (TST) in the presence or absence of CYPI (one-way analysis of variance, F4,75 = 3.89, P = 0.006). Data are represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 16/group). **P < 0.01 compared with CYPI, ##P < 0.01 compared with saline/(R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) treatment

References

    1. Zarate CA, Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:856–64. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:351–4. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00230-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto K. Ketamine’s antidepressant action: beyond NMDA receptor inhibition. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20:1389–92. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2016.1238899. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kishimoto T, Chawla JM, Hagi K, Zarate CA, Kane JM, Bauer M, et al. Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories. Psychol Med. 2016;46:1459–72. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang C, Ren Q, Qu Y, Zhang JC, Ma M, Dong C, et al. Mechanistic target of rapamycin-independent antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine in a social defeat stress model. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;83:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms