Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 26;19(5):1363-1366.
doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.5.1363.

Comparison of Salivary Cotinine Concentrations in Male Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users

Affiliations

Comparison of Salivary Cotinine Concentrations in Male Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users

Marieh Honarmand et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Objective: Smoking cigarettes and smokeless tobacco are one of the causes of oral cancer. This study compared the salivary level of cotinine in male smokeless tobacco users and smokers. Methods: In this cross-sectional (descriptive-analytical) study, stimulated saliva samples from 30 male smokers and 30 male smokeless tobacco consumers were collected and their cotinine contents were measured using the competitive ELISA method according the standard curve. The data was analyzed with independent t-test and linear regression using SPSS-19, and P<0.05 was considered significant. Result: Among the 60 subjects with the mean age of 21.27±2.6 years, the average level of cotinine in smokers (12.32±7.5 ng/ml) had no significant difference with that of smokeless tobacco consumers (11.23±4.4 ng/ml) (p=0.49). Conclusion: Salivary levels of cotinine were not significantly different in smokeless tobacco users and cigarette smokers. In addition, increases in the number of cigarettes smoked and in pack of smokeless tobacco used, were associated with increased salivary levels of cotinine. The increase was higher in smokeless tobacco consumers.

Keywords: Saliva; cotinine; smokeless tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aliva-tang E, AL-Delaimy W, Ashley D, et al. Assessing second hand smoke using biological markers. Tob control. 2013;22:164–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amtha R, Razzak IA, Basuki B, et al. Tobacco (kretek) smoking, betel quid chewing and risk of oral cancer in a selected jakarta population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:8673–8. - PubMed
    1. Bhawna G. Burden of smoked and smokeless tobacco consumption in India - results from the global adult tobacco survey India (GATS-India)- 2009-201. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:3323–9. - PubMed
    1. Binnie V, McHugh S, Macpherson L, et al. The validation of self-reported smoking status by analyzing cotinine levels in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, serum and urine. Oral Dis. 2004;10:287–93. - PubMed
    1. Boffetta P, Hecht S, Gray N, Gupta P, Straif K. Smokeless tobacco and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:667–75. - PubMed