The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
- PMID: 29804315
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.14420
The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the extent to which clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) can be detected in a routine National Health Service setting in men with no previous biopsy, when multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is introduced into the diagnostic pathway.
Patients and methods: In all, 1 090 mpMRIs were performed between July 2013 and April 2016 in biopsy-naïve men with an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level and/or digital rectal examination. Data were collected from patient records at the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. mpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores were compared to transperineal or transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy findings as the reference standard. csPCa was defined as Gleason score of ≥3+4. The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI was also assessed.
Results: The mpMRI was interpretable in 1 023 men and 792 underwent biopsy, of which 106 were transperineal. The median number of cores taken in transperineal and TRUS-guided biopsy were 10 and 6, respectively. The detection rate of csPCa was 37%; csPCa rose from 15% of PI-RADS 1 and 2 to 86% of PI-RADS 5. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, specificity, and positive predictive value were 82%, 85%, 59% and 54%, respectively. The study is limited by its retrospective nature and lack of reporting of follow-up for 'missed cancers'. Men with low mpMRI PI-RADS were also less likely to undergo biopsy. Whilst this selection bias may overestimate the detection rate of csPCa, this reflects the shared decisions patients and clinicians make in day-to-day practice outside of research centres.
Conclusion: In a routine clinical setting, the higher the mpMRI PI-RADS, the greater the detection rate of csPCa in biopsy-naïve men. A normal mpMRI does not exclude csPCa; however, mpMRI may have utility in informing shared-decision making on whether to proceed to biopsy and subsequent treatment.
Keywords: #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; diagnosis; imaging; magnetic resonance; multiparametric MRI.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 31100225
-
Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 May 15. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 31100235
-
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 30477981
-
Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32444265
-
Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33358543
Cited by
-
The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa).Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Sep 2;20(10):60. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0926-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31478113 Review.
-
The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer depends on the affected region.BJUI Compass. 2020 Nov 28;2(3):178-187. doi: 10.1002/bco2.62. eCollection 2021 May. BJUI Compass. 2020. PMID: 35475134 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in negative predictive value of prostate MRI based in men with suspected or known cancer.Radiol Bras. 2019 Sep-Oct;52(5):281-286. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2018.0126. Radiol Bras. 2019. PMID: 31656343 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-based radiomics model to predict benign and malignant PI-RADS v2.1 category 3 lesions: a retrospective multi-center study.BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01002-9. BMC Med Imaging. 2023. PMID: 36991347 Free PMC article.
-
Integrative Machine Learning Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Results From Negative Multiparametric MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;55(1):100-110. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27793. Epub 2021 Jun 23. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34160114 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous