Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 1:238:1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 26.

Mapping depression rating scale phenotypes onto research domain criteria (RDoC) to inform biological research in mood disorders

Affiliations

Mapping depression rating scale phenotypes onto research domain criteria (RDoC) to inform biological research in mood disorders

Ahmed T Ahmed et al. J Affect Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Substantial research progress can be achieved if available clinical datasets can be mapped to the National Institute of Mental Health Research-Domain-Criteria (RDoC) constructs. This mapping would allow investigators to both explore more narrowly defined clinical phenotypes and the relationship of these phenotypes to biological markers and clinical outcomes approximating RDoC criteria.

Methods: Using expert review and consensus, we defined four major depression phenotypes based on specific RDoC constructs. Having matched these constructs to individual items from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, we identified subjects meeting criteria for each of these phenotypes from two large clinical trials of patients treated for major depression. In a post hoc analysis, we evaluated the overall treatment response based on the phenotypes: Core Depression (CD), Anxiety (ANX), and Neurovegetative Symptoms of Melancholia (NVSM) and Atypical Depression (NVSAD).

Results: The phenotypes were prevalent (range 10.5-52.4%, 50% reduction range 51.9-82.9%) and tracked with overall treatment response. Although the CD phenotype was associated with lower rates of remission in both cohorts, this was mainly driven by baseline symptom severity. However, when controlling for baseline severity, patients with the ANX phenotype had a significantly lower rate of remission.

Limitations: The lack of replication between the studies of the phenotypes' treatment prediction value reflects important variability across studies that may limit generalizability.

Conclusion: Further work evaluating biological markers associated with these phenotypes is needed for further RDoC concept development.

Keywords: Anxiety; Core depression; Major depressive disorder; Neurovegetative symptoms of melancholia and atypical depression; Research domain criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:

none

Figures

Figure 1a.
Figure 1a.
Overlap between (Mayo data and Emory data) positive phenotype [Core Depression (CD), Neurovegetative Symptoms of Melancholia (NVSM), and Anxiety (ANX)]. Circles represent each group of the phenotype. The numbers and percentages inside overlapping circles represent patients whom achieved the positive phenotype and the overlap between them.
Figure 1b.
Figure 1b.
Overlap between (Mayo data) positive phenotype [Core Depression (CD), Neurovegetative Symptoms of Melancholia (NVSM), and Anxiety (ANX) defined by HAMD-17] [Neurovegetative Symptoms of Atypical Depression (NSAD) defined by QIDS-C16]. Circles represent each group of the phenotype. The numbers and percentages inside overlapping circles represent patients whom achieved the positive phenotype and the overlap between them.

References

    1. Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Silverstein B, Ajdacic–Gross V, Eich D, Rössler W, 2006. Atypical depressive syndromes in varying definitions. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 256, 44–54. - PubMed
    1. Arnow BA, Blasey C, Williams LM, Palmer DM, Rekshan W, Schatzberg AF, Etkin A, Kulkarni J, Luther JF, Rush AJ, 2015. Depression Subtypes in Predicting Antidepressant Response: A Report From the iSPOT-D Trial. The American journal of psychiatry 172, 743–750. - PubMed
    1. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, Marshall MB, 2004. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight? The American journal of psychiatry 161, 2163–2177. - PubMed
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG, 1988. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 8, 77–100.
    1. Benazzi F, 2002. Can only reversed vegetative symptoms define atypical depression? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 252, 288–293. - PubMed

Publication types