To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation
- PMID: 29807657
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127
To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the degree of decision regret following elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) for social indications, and identify factors associated with regret.
Design: Retrospective cohort survey study.
Setting: Academic center.
Patients: Two hundred one women who underwent EOC for fertility preservation between 2012 and 2016.
Interventions: None.
Main outcome measures: Decision Regret Scale (DRS) score, from 0-100, with a cut-off >25 indicative of moderate to severe regret; and attitudes regarding decision satisfaction.
Results: Median DRS score was 0 (interquartile range 0-15) and the mean was 10 (range 0-90). Thirty-three women (16%) experienced moderate to severe decision regret. Factors associated with decision regret included: number of eggs frozen, perceived adequacy of information prior to EOC, adequacy of emotional support during EOC, and patient-estimated probability of achieving a live birth using their banked eggs. In a multivariate logistic model, increased perceived adequacy of information (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.97) and patient-estimated probability of achieving a live birth (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.96) were associated with reduced odds of regret. One hundred sixty-seven women (88%) reported increased control over reproductive planning following EOC. One hundred eighty-three (89%) affirmed they will be happy they froze eggs, even if they never use them.
Conclusions: The risk of decision regret following EOC is non-negligible. Low number of mature oocytes cryopreserved is a risk factor for increased regret, while perceptions of adequate information and emotional support, and increased patient-estimates of achieving a live birth using banked eggs are associated with reduced risk of regret.
Keywords: Elective oocyte cryopreservation; decision regret; fertility preservation; social egg freezing.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Elective oocyte cryopreservation: an ounce of prevention?Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1014-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 May 25. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29807656 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret?Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Feb;50(2):103944. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103944. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025. PMID: 39799100
-
Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):853-859. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex008. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28166330
-
Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1281-1290. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02789-w. Epub 2023 Apr 14. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37058259 Free PMC article.
-
Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1601-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1195. Epub 2021 Aug 25. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34452749
-
Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;29(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000339. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27922944 Review.
Cited by
-
Randomized control trial of a decision aid for women considering elective egg freezing: The Eggsurance study protocol.Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221139673. doi: 10.1177/17455057221139673. Womens Health (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36448651 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported quality of life scales in women undergoing oocyte freezing versus in vitro fertilization.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Oct;37(10):2419-2425. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01916-1. Epub 2020 Aug 13. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32794124 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' and providers' perspectives on non-urgent egg freezing decision-making: a thematic analysis.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 8;23(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02189-3. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36755254 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with decision outcomes along the planned oocyte cryopreservation pathway in a cohort of women who sought consultation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Nov;41(11):2987-2998. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03255-x. Epub 2024 Sep 21. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39305396
-
Achieving the "ideal" family size at advanced reproductive ages through oocyte cryopreservation.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Feb;36(2):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1303-5. Epub 2018 Sep 7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019. PMID: 30194616 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources