Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks
- PMID: 29809162
- DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aac872
Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks
Abstract
3D bioprinting with cell containing bioinks show great promise in the biofabrication of patient specific tissue constructs. To fulfil the multiple requirements of a bioink, a wide range of materials and bioink composition are being developed and evaluated with regard to cell viability, mechanical performance and printability. It is essential that the printability and printing fidelity is not neglected since failure in printing the targeted architecture may be catastrophic for the survival of the cells and consequently the function of the printed tissue. However, experimental evaluation of bioinks printability is time-consuming and must be kept at a minimum, especially when 3D bioprinting with cells that are valuable and costly. This paper demonstrates how experimental evaluation could be complemented with computer based simulations to evaluate newly developed bioinks. Here, a computational fluid dynamics simulation tool was used to study the influence of different printing parameters and evaluate the predictability of the printing process. Based on data from oscillation frequency measurements of the evaluated bioinks, a full stress rheology model was used, where the viscoelastic behaviour of the material was captured. Simulation of the 3D bioprinting process is a powerful tool and will help in reducing the time and cost in the development and evaluation of bioinks. Moreover, it gives the opportunity to isolate parameters such as printing speed, nozzle height, flow rate and printing path to study their influence on the printing fidelity and the viscoelastic stresses within the bioink. The ability to study these features more extensively by simulating the printing process will result in a better understanding of what influences the viability of cells in 3D bioprinted tissue constructs.
Similar articles
-
The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.Biofabrication. 2015 Nov 2;7(4):045002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002. Biofabrication. 2015. PMID: 26523399
-
Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.Biofabrication. 2017 Nov 14;9(4):044107. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8. Biofabrication. 2017. PMID: 28930091
-
Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.Biofabrication. 2016 Sep 16;8(3):035020. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020. Biofabrication. 2016. PMID: 27634915
-
Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.Acta Biomater. 2020 Sep 1;113:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 2. Acta Biomater. 2020. PMID: 32622053 Review.
-
Bioprinting: A focus on improving bioink printability and cell performance based on different process parameters.Int J Pharm. 2023 Jun 10;640:123020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123020. Epub 2023 May 4. Int J Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37149110 Review.
Cited by
-
The future of skin toxicology testing - Three-dimensional bioprinting meets microfluidics.Int J Bioprint. 2019 Sep 20;5(2.1):237. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.237. eCollection 2019. Int J Bioprint. 2019. PMID: 32596546 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced optical assessment and modeling of extrusion bioprinting.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;14(1):13972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64039-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38886452 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.Tissue Eng Part A. 2020 Dec;26(23-24):1349-1358. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0210. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020. PMID: 32928068 Free PMC article.
-
Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views.J Funct Biomater. 2022 Apr 10;13(2):40. doi: 10.3390/jfb13020040. J Funct Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35466222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Natural-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications.Molecules. 2020 Dec 11;25(24):5858. doi: 10.3390/molecules25245858. Molecules. 2020. PMID: 33322369 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources