Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 17:10:1259-1273.
doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S163391. eCollection 2018.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies

Affiliations
Review

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions induced by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies

Chun-Bing Chen et al. Cancer Manag Res. .

Abstract

With the increasing use of targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies, there have been a substantial number of reports concerning life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Although the potential risks and characteristics for targeted anticancer agent- and immunotherapy-induced SCAR were not well understood, these serious adverse reactions usually result in morbidity and sequela. As a treatment guideline for this devastating condition is still unavailable, prompt withdrawal of causative drugs is believed to be a priority of patient management. In this review, we outline distinct types of SCARs caused by targeted anticancer therapies and immunotherapies. Also, we discuss the clinical course, latency, concomitant medication, tolerability of rechallenge or alternatives, tumor response, and mortality associated with these devastating conditions. Imatinib, vemurafenib, and rituximab were the top three offending medications that most commonly caused SJS/TEN, while EGFR inhibitors were the group of drugs that most frequently induced SJS/TEN. For drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, imatinib was also the most common offending drug. Additionally, we delineated 10 SCAR cases related to innovative immunotherapies, including PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors. There was a wide range of latency periods: 5.5-91 days (median). Only eight of 16 reported patients with SCAR showed clinical responses. Targeted anticancer drugs and immunotherapies can lead to lethal SCAR (14 deceased patients were identified as suffering from SJS/TEN). The mortality rate of TEN was high: up to 52.4%. The information compiled herein will serve as a solid foundation to formulate ideas for early recognition of SCAR and to discontinue offending drugs for better management.

Keywords: Stevens–Johnson syndrome; acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis; drug rash; eosinophilia; immunotherapy; targeted therapy; toxic epidermal necrolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fatal toxic epidermal necrolysis after cetuximab treatment for 8 weeks. Notes: A 74-year-old man who had moderately differentiated metastatic colon adenocarcinoma presented diffuse erythematous plaques with dusky red centers on trunk and extremities after treatment with cetuximab for 8 weeks. The skin rashes were confluent and formed large blisters or skin detachments involving more than 70% of the body surface area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms after erlotinib treatment for 4 weeks. Notes: A 60-year-old woman with EGFR-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib for 4 weeks. She developed generalized infiltrative exanthema on trunk and limbs accompanied by fever, acute liver failure, coagulopathy, and leukocytosis with eosinophilia. Further lymphocyte activation testing confirmed a hypersensitivity reaction to erlotinib.

References

    1. Macdonald JB, Macdonald B, Golitz LE, LoRusso P, Sekulic A. Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies – part I: inhibitors of the cellular membrane. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(2):203–220. - PubMed
    1. Rosen AC, Balagula Y, Raisch DW, et al. Life-threatening dermatologic adverse events in oncology. Anticancer Drugs. 2014;25(2):225–234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips EJ, Chung WH, Mockenhaupt M, Roujeau JC, Mallal SA. Drug hypersensitivity: pharmacogenetics and clinical syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3 Suppl):S60–S66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(19):1272–1285. - PubMed
    1. Roujeau JC, Guillaume JC, Fabre JP, Penso D, Fléchet ML, Girre JP. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell syndrome): incidence and drug etiology in France, 1981–1985. Arch Dermatol. 1990;126(1):37–42. - PubMed