Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 11:2018:2634768.
doi: 10.1155/2018/2634768. eCollection 2018.

Disparity between High Satisfaction and Severe Pain in Patients after Caesarean Section: A Prospective Observational-Controlled Investigation

Affiliations

Disparity between High Satisfaction and Severe Pain in Patients after Caesarean Section: A Prospective Observational-Controlled Investigation

Thomas Hesse et al. Anesthesiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Objectives: Recent advances in the treatment of postoperative pain (POP) have increased the quality of life in surgical patients. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of POP management in patients after CS in comparison with patients after comparable surgical procedures.

Methods: This was a prospective observational analysis in patients after CS in comparison with the patients of the same age, who underwent comparable abdominal gynaecological surgeries (GS group) at the university hospital. A standardised questionnaire including pain intensity on the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-11), incidence of analgesia-related side effects, and incidence of pain interference with the items of quality of life and patients' satisfaction with the treatment of POP was used.

Results: Sixty-four patients after CS reported more pain on movement than the patients after GS (N=63): mean 6.1 versus 3.6 (VRS-11; P < 0.001). The patients after CS reported less nausea (8 versus 41%) and vomiting (3 versus 21%; P < 0.001) and demonstrated better satisfaction with POP treatment than the patients after GS: 1.4 (0.7) versus 1.7 (0.7) (mean (SD); VRS-5; P=0.02).

Conclusion: The disparity between the high level of pain and excellent satisfaction with POP treatment raises the ethical and biomedical considerations of restrictive pharmacological therapy of post-CS pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of multimodal analgesia adjusted to the expected level of postoperative pain in patients after caesarian section at the university hospital of Greifswald. Piritramide is an opioid analgesic with 0.7 potency of morphine, used to treat acute postoperative pain in Germany.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Pain levels and patients' satisfaction with pain treatment. A priori surgical pain is an anticipated procedure-specific POP intensity, depending on the size and localisation of surgical lesion defined according to [2]. Data are given as mean (SD); P < 0.0001; Student's t-test. (b) Frequency of opioid-induced side effects given as percent from the total number of patients in the audits; numeric values within the bars on the graph are absolute number of patients; P < 0.0001; χ 2 test.

References

    1. Usichenko T. I., Röttenbacher I., Kohlmann T., et al. Implementation of the quality management system improves postoperative pain treatment: a prospective pre-/post-interventional questionnaire study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013;110(1):87–95. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes352. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan M., Law L. S. C., Gan T. J. Optimizing pain management to facilitate enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2015;62(2):203–218. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0275-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pogatzki-Zahn E., Kutschar P., Nestler N., Osterbrink J. A prospective multicentre study to improve postoperative pain: identification of potentialities and problems. PLoS One. 2015;10e0143508 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerbershagen H. J., Aduckathil S., van Wijck A. J. M., Peelen L. M., Kalkman C. J., Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934–944. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e31828866b3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcus H., Gerbershagen H. J., Peelen L. M., et al. Quality of pain treatment after caesarean section: results of a multicentre cohort study. European Journal of Pain. 2015;19:929–939. doi: 10.1002/ejp.619. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources