Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;21(13):2351-2359.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001416. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

Improving the nutrition and screen time environment through self-assessment in family childcare homes in Nebraska

Affiliations

Improving the nutrition and screen time environment through self-assessment in family childcare homes in Nebraska

Dipti A Dev et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if family childcare homes (FCCH) in Nebraska meet best practices for nutrition and screen time, and if focusing on nutrition and screen time policies and practices improves the FCCH environment.

Design: A pre-post evaluation was conducted using the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Childcare (Go NAP SACC).

Setting: FCCH in Nebraska, USA.

Subjects: FCCH enrolled in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP; n 208) participated in a pre-post evaluation using Go NAP SACC.

Results: At baseline, all FCCH met the minimum childcare standards for fifty-four of fifty-six practices in nutrition and screen time. After the intervention, FCCH demonstrated significant improvement in fourteen of the forty-four Child Nutrition items and eleven of the twelve Screen Time items. However, FCCH providers did not meet best practices at post-intervention. Lowest scores were found in serving meals family-style, promoting visible support for healthy eating, planned nutrition education and written policy on child nutrition. For screen time, lowest scores were reported on the availability of television, offering families education on screen time and having a written policy on screen time.

Conclusions: FCCH in Nebraska were able to strengthen their policies and practices after utilizing Go NAP SACC. Continued professional development and participation in targeted interventions may assist programmes in sustaining improved practices and policies. Considering the varying standards and policies surrounding FCCH, future studies comparing the current findings with childcare centres and non-CACFP programmes are warranted.

Keywords: Family childcare homes; Go NAP SACC; Nutrition practices; Obesity; Screen time.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK et al. (2014) Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 311, 806–814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Nebraska state nutrition, physical activity, and obesity profile. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/stateprograms/fundedstates/pdf/Nebraska-State... (accessed June 2017).
    1. Spruijt-Metz D (2011) Etiology, treatment, and prevention of obesity in childhood and adolescence: a decade in review. J Res Adolesc 21, 129–152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laughlin L (2013) Who’s Minding the Kids? Childcare Arrangements: Spring 2011. Current Population Reports: Household Economic Studies no. 135, pp. 70–135. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
    1. Battista RA, Oakley H, Weddell MS et al. (2014) Improving the physical activity and nutrition environment through self-assessment (NAP SACC) in rural area childcare centers in North Carolina. Prev Med 67, Suppl. 1, S10–S16. - PubMed

Publication types