Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 31;5(2):e22.
doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9328.

The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review

Saif Sherif Khairat et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in the United States admit more than 5.7 million people each year. The ICU level of care helps people with life-threatening illness or injuries and involves close, constant attention by a team of specially-trained health care providers. Delay between condition onset and implementation of necessary interventions can dramatically impact the prognosis of patients with life-threatening diagnoses. Evidence supports a connection between information overload and medical errors. A tool that improves display and retrieval of key clinical information has great potential to benefit patient outcomes. The purpose of this review is to synthesize research on the use of visualization dashboards in health care.

Objective: The purpose of conducting this literature review is to synthesize previous research on the use of dashboards visualizing electronic health record information for health care providers. A review of the existing literature on this subject can be used to identify gaps in prior research and to inform further research efforts on this topic. Ultimately, this evidence can be used to guide the development, testing, and implementation of a new solution to optimize the visualization of clinical information, reduce clinician cognitive overload, and improve patient outcomes.

Methods: Articles were included if they addressed the development, testing, implementation, or use of a visualization dashboard solution in a health care setting. An initial search was conducted of literature on dashboards only in the intensive care unit setting, but there were not many articles found that met the inclusion criteria. A secondary follow-up search was conducted to broaden the results to any health care setting. The initial and follow-up searches returned a total of 17 articles that were analyzed for this literature review.

Results: Visualization dashboard solutions decrease time spent on data gathering, difficulty of data gathering process, cognitive load, time to task completion, errors, and improve situation awareness, compliance with evidence-based safety guidelines, usability, and navigation.

Conclusions: Researchers can build on the findings, strengths, and limitations of the work identified in this literature review to bolster development, testing, and implementation of novel visualization dashboard solutions. Due to the relatively few studies conducted in this area, there is plenty of room for researchers to test their solutions and add significantly to the field of knowledge on this subject.

Keywords: cognitive load; electronic health record; health information technology; information overload; intensive care unit; usability; user interface design; visualization, Dashboard.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature review process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
“Elements of data are pulled from across the entire electronic medical record and are organized in the systems based manner most commonly encountered in the study's intensive care unit setting.” [10].
Figure 3
Figure 3
“Elements of data are pulled from across the entire electronic medical record and are organized in the systems based manner most commonly encountered in the study's intensive care unit setting.” [10].
Figure 4
Figure 4
“(A) Nurses see an overview of the patient's vital signs, currently administered and scheduled medication, essential ventilation data, and fluid balance. (B) When selecting a medication they see medication compatibility with the other current and scheduled medication, and potential adverse effects.” [11].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Summary of findings from the literature review. EHR: electronic health record.

References

    1. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Critical Care. 2017. [2018-05-09]. Critical care statistics http://www.sccm.org/Communications/Pages/CriticalCareStats.aspx .
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2016. Critical care https://medlineplus.gov/criticalcare.html . - PubMed
    1. Charles D, Gabriel M. Adoption of electronic health record systems among U.S. non-federal acute care hospitals. ONC Data Brief. Washington DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2015. Searcy; pp. 2008–2014.
    1. Thompson G, O'Horo JC, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Impact of the Electronic Medical Record on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost in the Hospital and ICU: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1276–82. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000948. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Sittig DF. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22;173(8):702–4. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.61. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23460235 1657753 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources