Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;30(3):296-303.
doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.3.296. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

Usefulness of Monopolar Thermal Radiofrequency Treatment for Periorbital Wrinkles

Song Hee Han  1 , Yeong Min Yoon  2 , Yang Won Lee  1 , Yong Beom Choe  1 , Kyu Joong Ahn  1
Affiliations

Usefulness of Monopolar Thermal Radiofrequency Treatment for Periorbital Wrinkles

Song Hee Han et al. Ann Dermatol. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Over the past 10 years, monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) technology has been widely used by dermatologists as a valuable modality to effectively tighten and rejuvenate photoaged skin. It also has the benefit of a short recovery time.

Objective: Using an objective parameter, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MRF, which is the basic modality of radiofrequency technologies, for treatment of periorbital wrinkles in Korean patients.

Methods: We enrolled 70 middle-aged female patients with periorbital wrinkles for this study. Each patient underwent triple sessions of MRF treatment in the periorbital region, separated by 2-week intervals. Clinical photographs were obtained, and the areas of wrinkles were measured using a Robo Skin Analyzer CS50 (Inforward Inc., Japan) at baseline and 4 weeks after the final treatment session.

Results: Significant reduction in the mean area of periorbital wrinkles was detected at 1-month follow-up (80.64±28.96 mm2) compared to baseline (95.08±31.93 mm2). The improvement ratio of the wrinkle area was 15.19%. Pain during procedure seemed to be tolerable without any local anesthesia for all patients. Transient mild erythema was the only side effect reported during the study.

Conclusion: In conclusion, MRF could still be an attractive modality for Korean patients with periorbital wrinkles if the treatment is conducted repeatedly with sufficient energy and proper intervals.

Keywords: Monopolar radiofrequency; Periorbital wrinkles; Photoaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Yeong Min Yoon is an engineer of Eunsung Global Corporation. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Mimetic diagram of the contact area of the tip (A) and ground pad of the monopolar radiofrequency device (B) used in this study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (A) The mean area of periorbital wrinkles measured using the Robo Skin Analyzer (Inforward Inc., Japan) at baseline and at the 1-month follow-up. The area of periorbital wrinkles significantly decreased (80.64±28.96 mm2) compared with baseline (95.08±31.93 mm2). (B, C) Age as a factor in the effect of monopolar radiofrequency on periorbital wrinkles. The mean area of periorbital wrinkles at baseline and at the 1-month follow-up in two groups: the older group (B, ≥55 years) and the younger group (C, <55 years). In the older group, at the 1-month follow-up, the mean area had decreased to 89.82±30.80 mm2 compared with the baseline of 104.03±30.89 mm2. In contrast, in the young-age group, the mean area of 75.13±26.22 mm2 at the 1-month follow-up was not a substantial decrease from the baseline mean of 85.56±30.67 mm2. Unpaired t-test was applied for statistical analyses. Statistically significant, *p<0.05. ***p<0.0001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. A 56-year-old female patient assessed by the Robo Skin Analyzer (Inforward Inc., Japan). The periorbital wrinkle area was decreased at 4 weeks after the final treatment (B, D) compared to at baseline (A, C).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. A 52-year-old female patient assessed by the Robo Skin Analyzer (Inforward Inc., Japan). The periorbital wrinkle area was decreased at 4 weeks after the final treatment (B, D) compared to at baseline (A, C).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (A) The baseline areas of periorbital wrinkles in the older group (≥55 years) and the younger group (<55 years): 80.56±30.67 mm2 and 75.13±26.22 mm2, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Mann Whitney test was applied. **Statistically significant, p<0.01. (B) Baseline severity as a factor in the effect of monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) on periorbital wrinkles. The improvement ratio was determined for two groups: the severe group (baseline wrinkle area ≥91 mm2) and the mild group (baseline wrinkle area <91 mm2). The results show the general tendency for more improvement in the severe group compared with the mild group. In the severe group, most patients had improvement in periorbital wrinkles. In contrast, in the mild group, numerous patients had an increase in periorbital wrinkles, resulting in a negative improvement ratio despite the MRF treatment.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Results of the subjective satisfaction survey on periorbital wrinkle reduction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1765–1776. - PubMed
    1. Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA. Nonsurgical nonablative treatment of aging skin: radiofrequency technologies between aggressive marketing and evidence-based efficacy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:283–294. - PubMed
    1. el-Domyati M, el-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Brennan D, Mahoney MG, et al. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:524–535. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taub AF, Tucker RD, Palange A. Facial tightening with an advanced 4-MHz monopolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:1288–1294. - PubMed
    1. Alster TS, Lupton JR. Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:487–491. - PubMed