A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Morbidity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
- PMID: 29857555
- PMCID: PMC6024377
- DOI: 10.3390/nu10060707
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Milk Feeding and Morbidity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised the post-1990 literature examining the effect of human milk on morbidity, specifically necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), late onset sepsis (LOS), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and neurodevelopment in infants born ≤28 weeks' gestation and/or publications with reported infant mean birth weight of ≤1500 g. Online databases including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and comparisons were grouped as follows: exclusive human milk (EHM) versus exclusive preterm formula (EPTF), any human milk (HM) versus EPTF, higher versus lower dose HM, and unpasteurised versus pasteurised HM. Experimental and observational studies were pooled separately in meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed for each individual study and the GRADE system used to judge the certainty of the findings. Forty-nine studies (with 56 reports) were included, of which 44 could be included in meta-analyses. HM provided a clear protective effect against NEC, with an approximate 4% reduction in incidence. HM also provided a possible reduction in LOS, severe ROP and severe NEC. Particularly for NEC, any volume of HM is better than EPTF, and the higher the dose the greater the protection. Evidence regarding pasteurisation is inconclusive, but it appears to have no effect on some outcomes. Improving the intake of mother's own milk (MOM) and/or donor HM results in small improvements in morbidity in this population.
Keywords: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; donor human milk; formula feeding; human milk; necrotising enterocolitis; neurodevelopment; preterm infant; retinopathy of prematurity; sepsis.
Conflict of interest statement
The views expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia. C.T.C. and M.M. are authors on an included paper (Jacobi-Polishook 2016). Collins’ salary was supported by a Research Fellowship from the M.S. McLeod Research Fund of the Women’s and Children’s Hospital Research Foundation and NHMRC TRIP Fellowship 1132596. Outside the submitted work, M.M. serves on scientific advisory boards for Fonterra and Nestle. Honoraria are paid to her institution for continuing education of early career researchers. M.M. also holds a Principal Research Fellowship from the NHMRC (APP1061704). All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Agostoni C., Buonocore G., Carnielli V.P., De Curtis M., Darmaun D., Decsi T., Domellöf M., Embleton N.D., Fusch C., Genzel-Boroviczeny O., et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: Commentary from the european society of paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition committee on nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010;50:85–91. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181adaee0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Committee on Nutrition. Section on Brreastfeeding. Committee on Fetus and Newborn Donor human milk for the high-risk infant: Preparation, safety, and usage options in the United States. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20163044. - PubMed
-
- Arslanoglu S., Corpeleijn W., Moro G., Braegger C., Campoy C., Colomb V., Decsi T., Domellof M., Fewtrell M., Hojsak I., et al. Donor human milk for preterm infants: Current evidence and research directions. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2013;57:535–542. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a3af0a. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
