Similar articles

• Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  Konstantonis D, Vasileiou D, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Konstantonis D, et al. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Jun;126(3):167-179. doi: 10.1111/eos.12409. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018. PMID: 29480521
• Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment.

  Young TM, Smith RJ. Young TM, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 May;103(5):452-8. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81796-2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993. PMID: 8480714
• Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.

  de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Almeida MR, McNamara JA Jr. de Almeida-Pedrin RR, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):833-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.032. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19962606
• Insufficient evidence available to reliably conclude how orthodontic treatment with lingual fixed appliances compares with orthodontic treatment with labial fixed appliances.

  Brignardello-Petersen R. Brignardello-Petersen R. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 May;149(5):e81. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.12.025. Epub 2018 Feb 6. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29426759 No abstract available.
• Twenty-year clinical experience with fixed functional appliances.

  Moro A, Borges SW, Spada PP, Morais ND, Correr GM, Chaves CM Jr, Cevidanes LHS. Moro A, et al. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):87-109. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.087-109.sar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29898162 Free PMC article. Review.