Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;52(12):807-812.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098953.

What works to promote walking at the population level? A systematic review

Affiliations

What works to promote walking at the population level? A systematic review

Charlie Foster et al. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Interventions to promote walking have focused on individual or group-based approaches, often via the randomised controlled trial design. Walking can also be promoted using population health approaches. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of population approaches to promote walking among individuals and populations.

Design: A systematic review.

Data sources: 10 electronic databases searched from January 1990 to March 2017.

Eligibility criteria: Eligibility criteria include pre-experimental and postexperimental studies of the effects of population interventions to change walking, and the effects must have been compared with a 'no intervention', or comparison group/area/population, or variation in exposure; duration of ≥12 months of follow up; participants in free-living populations; and English-language articles.

Results: 12 studies were identified from mostly urban high-income countries (one focusing on using tax, incentivising the loss of parking spaces; and one using policy only, permitting off-leash dogs in city parks). Five studies used mass media with either environment (n=2) or community (n=3) approaches. Four studies used environmental changes that were combined with policies. One study had scaled up school-based approaches to promote safe routes to schools. We found mass media, community initiatives and environmental change approaches increased walking (range from 9 to 75 min/week).

Keywords: public health; review; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study selection flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2. Estimated net increase in types of walking. Studies are ranked by validity (number of criteria met, see table 3), then baseline sample size

References

    1. Hardman AE, Morris JN. Walking to health. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32(2):184–84. - PubMed
    1. Roberts D, Townsend N, Foster C. Use of new guidance to profile ‘equivalent minutes’ of aerobic physical activity for adults in England reveals gender, geographical, and socio-economic inequalities in meeting public health guidance: A cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2016;4:50–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, et al. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Society for Physical Activity and Health ISPAH. Br J Sports Med. 2017;0:1–3. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murtagh EM, Nichols L, Mohammed MA, et al. The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Prev Med. 2015;72:34–43. - PubMed

Publication types