Pre-operative stromal stiffness measured by shear wave elastography is independently associated with breast cancer-specific survival
- PMID: 29858751
- PMCID: PMC6096877
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4836-5
Pre-operative stromal stiffness measured by shear wave elastography is independently associated with breast cancer-specific survival
Abstract
Introduction: With the increased use of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer, there is a need for pre-operative prediction of prognosis. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of tumour stiffness measured by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE).
Methods: A consecutive cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer underwent breast ultrasound (US) including SWE. The following were recorded prospectively: US diameter, stiffness at SWE, presentation source, core biopsy grade, oestrogen receptor (ER) status and pre-operative nodal status. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analysed with regard to US size and stiffness, tumour grade on core biopsy, ER status, presentation mode and pre-operative nodal status. Analysis used Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Of the 520 patients, 42 breast cancer and 53 non-breast cancer deaths were recorded at mean follow-up of 5.4 years. Hazard ratios (HR) for tertiles of stiffness were 1, 4.8 and 8.1 (P = 0.0001). HR for 2 groups based on US size < or ≥ 20 mm were 1 and 5.1 (P < 0.0001). HR for each unit increase in tumour grade on core biopsy was 3.9 (P < 0.0001). The HR for ER positivity compared to ER negativity was 0.21 (P < 0.001). BCSS was also associated with presentation mode and pre-operative nodal status. In a multivariable model, stiffness, US size and ER status were independently associated with BCSS.
Conclusion: Multiple pre-operative factors including stromal stiffness at SWE have independent prognostic significance. A larger dataset with longer follow-up could be used in the future to construct a pre-operative prognostic model to guide treatment decisions.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis; Shear wave elastography; Ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
AE has in the past had a PhD student part funded by Supersonic Imagine. The students work was not part of this project.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board ethical approval was waived for this retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data and all patients gave permission for evaluation of their images.
Figures
References
- 
    - Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:996–978. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE, Jr, Mamounas EP, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:133–142. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
 
- 
    - Chuang SL, Chen SL, Yu CP, Chang KJ, Yen AM, Chiu SY, Fann JC, Tabár L, Stephen DW, Smith RA, Chen HH. Using tumor phenotype, histological tumor distribution, and mammographic appearance to explain the survival differences between screen-detected and clinically detected breast cancers. APMIS. 2014;122:699–707. doi: 10.1111/apm.12294. - DOI - PubMed
 
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
- Medical
 
         
               
               
              