A method to identify pediatric high-risk diagnoses missed in the emergency department
- PMID: 29858901
- DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0005
A method to identify pediatric high-risk diagnoses missed in the emergency department
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic error can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare utilization and cost. The 2015 National Academy of Medicine report "Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare" called for improving diagnostic accuracy by developing innovative electronic approaches to reduce medical errors, including missed or delayed diagnosis. The objective of this article was to develop a process to detect potential diagnostic discrepancy between pediatric emergency and inpatient discharge diagnosis using a computer-based tool facilitating expert review.
Methods: Using a literature search and expert opinion, we identified 10 pediatric diagnoses with potential for serious consequences if missed or delayed. We then developed and applied a computerized tool to identify linked emergency department (ED) encounters and hospitalizations with these discharge diagnoses. The tool identified discordance between ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. Cases identified as discordant were manually reviewed by pediatric emergency medicine experts to confirm discordance.
Results: Our computerized tool identified 55,233 ED encounters for hospitalized children over a 5-year period, of which 2161 (3.9%) had one of the 10 selected high-risk diagnoses. After expert record review, we identified 67 (3.1%) cases with discordance between ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. The most common discordant diagnoses were Kawasaki disease and pancreatitis.
Conclusions: We successfully developed and applied a semi-automated process to screen a large volume of hospital encounters to identify discordant diagnoses for selected pediatric medical conditions. This process may be valuable for informing and improving ED diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords: emergency department; missed diagnosis; pediatrics.
References
-
- Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic errors the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA – J Am Med Assoc [Internet] 2009;301(10):1060–2. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-62149142125&partn....
-
- Medicine I of, National Academies of Sciences and Medicine E. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care [Internet]. Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21794/improving-diagnosis-in-health-care.
-
- Saber Tehrani AS, Lee HW, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, et al. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: An analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(8):672–80.
-
- Singh H, Thomas EJ, Petersen LA, Studdert DM. Medical errors involving trainees: A study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(19):2030–6.
-
- The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from www.nejm.org at YALE MEDICAL LIBRARY on October 22, 2010. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 1991 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. 1991.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources