Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;22(6):367-73.
doi: 10.29252/.22.6.367. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

Up-Regulation of miR-21, miR-25, miR-93, and miR-106b in Gastric Cancer

Affiliations

Up-Regulation of miR-21, miR-25, miR-93, and miR-106b in Gastric Cancer

Pegah LArki et al. Iran Biomed J. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Differential expression profile of microRNAs (miRNAs) could be a diagnosis signature for monitoring gastric cancer (GC) progression. In this study, we focus on the comparison of expression levels of miR-21, miR-25, miR-93, miR-106b, and miR-375 during the sequential pattern of GC development, including normal gastric, gastric dysplasia, and GC sample.

Methods: We used SYBR Green-based quantitative-PCR to quantify miRNAs expression.

Results: Our analysis revealed the increased expression levels of miR-21 (p = 0.034), miR-25 (p = 0.0003), miR-93 (p = 0.0406), and miR-106b (p = 0.023) in GC samples. In addition, GC patients with positive lymph node metastasis showed the up-regulation of miR-25, miR-93, and miR-106b (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggested that the expression of miR-21, miR-25, miR-93, and miR-106b altered in GC, and some of them may be further investigated as biomarkers for GC early detection and prognosis prediction.

Keywords: Biomarkers; microRNAs; Stomach cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relative expression (2-ΔΔCt) of miR-21 (A), miR-25 (B), miR-93 (C), miR-106b (D), and miR-375 (E) in the studied samples. *, **, *** indicate p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve analysis using different miRNAs for discriminating GC from normal tissue. ROC curves were constructed to show the specificity and sensitivity of miR-21 (A), miR-25 (B), miR-93 (C), and miR-106b (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA cancer journal for clinicians. 2011;61(2):69–90. - PubMed
    1. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Mizuta Y, Shiozawa J, Kohno S. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer:a large-scale feasibility study. Gut. 2009;58(3):331–336. - PubMed
    1. Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, del Rio MG. Treatment modalities for early gastric cancer. World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2015;7(12):1062–1069. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008:GLOBOCAN 2008. International journal of cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–2917. - PubMed
    1. Dhalla F, da Silva S, Lucas M, Travis S, Chapel H. Review of gastric cancer risk factors in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders, resulting in a proposal for a surveillance programme. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2011;165(1):1–7. - PMC - PubMed