Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 Apr;22(2):355-360.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Concurrent validity of pain scales in individuals with myofascial pain and fibromyalgia

Scott W Cheatham  1 , Morey J Kolber  2 , Monique Mokha  3 , William J Hanney  4
Affiliations
Comment

Concurrent validity of pain scales in individuals with myofascial pain and fibromyalgia

Scott W Cheatham et al. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Clinicians and researchers often use the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and visual analog scale (VAS) to measure and track pain in individuals with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and fibromyalgia (FM). The VAS is often used as a reference standard in chronic pain research. To date, no studies have specifically measured the concurrent validity of the NPRS and VAS in these individuals. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the concurrent validity of the NPRS when compared to the reference standard VAS in patients with MPS and FM.

Methods: This investigation explored the concurrent validity of the NPRS and VAS in sixty participants with MPS (N = 30) and FM (N = 30). All participants underwent one day of testing using the American College of Rheumatology criteria for classifying FM. For each tender point (18-total), participants graded tenderness using the NPRS and VAS.

Results: An excellent relationship was found between the NPRS and VAS for the MPS group (rho≥0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.85, p < 0.001) and the FM group (rho ≥0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the NPRS has good concurrent validity with the referenced standard VAS among individuals with MPS and FM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • A fascia and the fascial system.
    Stecco C, Schleip R. Stecco C, et al. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Jan;20(1):139-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 23. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016. PMID: 26891649 No abstract available.
  • Defining the fascial system.
    Adstrum S, Hedley G, Schleip R, Stecco C, Yucesoy CA. Adstrum S, et al. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 16. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017. PMID: 28167173
  • Comment on 'Defining the fascial system'.
    Scarr G. Scarr G. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):178. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 14. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017. PMID: 28167174 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources