Transcriptome analysis reveals a long non-coding RNA signature to improve biochemical recurrence prediction in prostate cancer
- PMID: 29861844
- PMCID: PMC5982764
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25048
Transcriptome analysis reveals a long non-coding RNA signature to improve biochemical recurrence prediction in prostate cancer
Abstract
Despite highly successful treatments for localized prostate cancer (PCa), prognostic biomarkers are needed to improve patient management and prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are key regulators with biological and clinical significance. By transcriptome analysis, we identified a set of consistently dysregulated lncRNAs in PCa across different datasets and revealed an eight-lncRNA signature that significantly associated with the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. Based on the signature, patients could be classified into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different survival (HR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.67-2.88; P < 0.0001). Validations in the validation cohorts and another independent cohort confirmed its prognostic value for recurrence prediction. Multivariable analysis showed that the signature was independent of common clinicopathological features and stratified analysis further revealed its role in elevating risk stratification of current prognostic models. Additionally, the eight-lncRNA signature was able to improve on the CAPRA-S score for the prediction of BCR as well as to reflect the metastatic potential of PCa. Functional characterization suggested that these lncRNAs which showed PCa-specific expression patterns may involve in critical processes in tumorigenesis. Overall, our results demonstrated potential application of lncRNAs as novel independent biomarkers. The eight-lncRNA signature may have clinical potential for facilitating further stratification of more aggressive patients who would benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Keywords: BCR-free survival; lncRNA signature; prognosis; prostate cancer; transcriptome.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures






References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rosenbaum E, Partin A, Eisenberger MA. Biochemical relapse after primary treatment for prostate cancer: studies on natural history and therapeutic considerations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2004;2:249–56. - PubMed
-
- Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR. Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1117–23. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Dotan ZA, Bianco FJ, Jr, Lilja H, Scardino PT. Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3973–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0756. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lee G, Sparks R, Ali S, Shih NN, Feldman MD, Spangler E, Rebbeck T, Tomaszewski JE, Madabhushi A. Co-occurring gland angularity in localized subgraphs: predicting biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097954. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources