Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;6(8):157.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.05.

The search for gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: challenges in abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation

Affiliations

The search for gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: challenges in abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation

Marylyn D Ritchie et al. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

One of the primary goals in this era of precision medicine is to understand the biology of human diseases and their treatment, such that each individual patient receives the best possible treatment for their disease based on their genetic and environmental exposures. One way to work towards achieving this goal is to identify the environmental exposures and genetic variants that are relevant to each disease in question, as well as the complex interplay between genes and environment. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have allowed for a greater understanding of the genetic component of many complex traits. However, these genetic effects are largely small and thus, our ability to use these GWAS finding for precision medicine is limited. As more and more GWAS have been performed, rather than focusing only on common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and additive genetic models, many researchers have begun to explore alternative heritable components of complex traits including rare variants, structural variants, epigenetics, and genetic interactions. While genetic interactions are a plausible reality that could explain some of the heritabliy that has not yet been identified, especially when one considers the identification of genetic interactions in model organisms as well as our understanding of biological complexity, still there are significant challenges and considerations in identifying these genetic interactions. Broadly, these can be summarized in three categories: abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation. In this review, we will discuss these important elements in the search for genetic interactions along with some potential solutions. While genetic interactions are theoretically understood to be important for complex human disease, the body of evidence is still building to support this component of the underlying genetic architecture of complex human traits. Our hope is that more sophisticated modeling approaches and more robust computational techniques will enable the community to identify these important genetic interactions and improve our ability to implement precision medicine in the future.

Keywords: Epistasis; data mining; genetic interactions; statistical methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart describing the process of testing for epistatic interactions and challenges necessary to address at each step. A number of important considerations and decisions come into play when performing an epistasis analysis. This flowchart provides an overview of these steps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of genetic models represented as penetrance functions. Genetic interaction models can be represented as penetrance functions based on many different types of underlying genetic models. Three examples are shown here. The value in each box indicates the penetrance, or the probability of disease given that genotype combination. The value, x, can be any value such that the resulting penetrance value is between 0 and 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D896-901. 10.1093/nar/gkw1133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welter D, MacArthur J, Morales J, et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D1001-1006. 10.1093/nar/gkt1229 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monir MM, Zhu J. Comparing GWAS Results of Complex Traits Using Full Genetic Model and Additive Models for Revealing Genetic Architecture. Sci Rep 2017;7:38600. 10.1038/srep38600 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi H, Kichaev G, Pasaniuc B. Contrasting the Genetic Architecture of 30 Complex Traits from Summary Association Data. Am J Hum Genet 2016;99:139-53. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature 2008;456:18-21. 10.1038/456018a - DOI - PubMed