Feasibility of WHO mhGAP-intervention guide in reducing experienced discrimination in people with mental disorders: a pilot study in a rural Kenyan setting
- PMID: 29862937
- PMCID: PMC6999029
- DOI: 10.1017/S2045796018000264
Feasibility of WHO mhGAP-intervention guide in reducing experienced discrimination in people with mental disorders: a pilot study in a rural Kenyan setting
Abstract
AimsStigma can have a negative impact on help-seeking behaviour, treatment adherence and recovery of people with mental disorders. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of the WHO Mental Health Treatment Gap Interventions Guidelines (mhGAP-IG) to reduce stigma in face-to-face contacts during interventions for specific DSM-IV/ICD 10 diagnoses over a 6-month period.
Methods: This study was conducted in 20 health facilities across Makueni County in southeast Kenya which has one of the poorest economies in the country and has no psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. We recruited 2305 participants from the health facilities catchment areas that had already been exposed to community mental health services. We measured stigma using DISC-12 at baseline, followed by training to the health professionals on intervention using the WHO mhGAP-IG and then conducted a follow-up DISC-12 assessment after 6 months. Proper management of the patients by the trained professionals would contribute to the reduction of stigma in the patients.
Results: There was 59.5% follow-up at 6 months. Overall, there was a significant decline in 'reported/experienced discrimination' following the interventions. A multivariate linear mixed model regression indicated that better outcomes of 'unfair treatment' scores were associated with: being married, low education, being young, being self-employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression. For 'stopping self' domain, better outcomes were associated with being female, married, employed, young, lower wealth index and a depression diagnosis. In regards to 'overcoming stigma' domain; being male, being educated, employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression was associated with better outcomes.
Conclusions: The statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction of discrimination following the interventions by trained health professionals suggest that the mhGAP-IG may be a useful tool for reduction of discrimination in rural settings in low-income countries.
Keywords: Discrimination; mental health; mental illness stigma; primary care.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Ali A, King M, Strydom A, Hassiotis A (2016). Self-reported stigma and its association with socio-demographic factors and physical disability in people with intellectual disabilities: results from a cross-sectional study in England. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 51, 465–474. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen H (2006). Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 40, 51–54. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Brohan E, Clement S, Rose D, Sartorius N, Slade M, Thornicroft G (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC). Psychiatry Research 208, 33–40. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Cohen J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale.
 
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Other Literature Sources
- Medical
- Miscellaneous
 
        