Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 May 30;36(1):1-13.

The applicability of the original and revised Demirjian standards to age estimations of 5-15 year old Indian children

S Hegde  1 , A Patodia  1 , U Dixit  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

The applicability of the original and revised Demirjian standards to age estimations of 5-15 year old Indian children

S Hegde et al. J Forensic Odontostomatol. .

Abstract

Background: The Demirjian method has been the most widely tested method for the estimation of the dental age of children and adolescents. However, only three studies have compared Demirjian's original and revised seven-tooth methods, four-tooth method and alternate four-tooth method, none of them conducted on an Indian population.

Aim: The present study aimed to compare the applicability of the original and revised seven-tooth and four-tooth and alternate four-tooth standards for age estimation of 1200 Indian children aged 5-15 years old.

Design: The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Results: Demirjian's original seven-tooth method overestimated age by 0.64 ± 1.44, 0.75 ± 1.50 and 0.69 ± 1.46 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Demirjian's revised seven-tooth method overestimated age by + 0.24 ± 0.80, + 0.11 ± 0.81 and + 0.19 ± 0.80 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Demirjian's original four-tooth method overestimated age by 0.79 ± 1.59, 0.59 ± 2.77 and 0.72 ± 2.30 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Demirjian's alternate four-tooth method overestimated age by 1.31 ± 1.07, 1.20 ± 1.10 and 1.26 ± 1.08 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between dental and chronological ages with all methods (p <0.001). Significant gender-based differences were observed only with Demirjian's revised seven-tooth and original four-tooth methods (p <0.05). Conclusion: The revised seven-tooth standards most accurately predicted the age of the study sample (mean prediction error = 2.28 months), followed by the original seven-tooth, four-tooth and alternate four-tooth standards. The Demirjian original seven-tooth method was significantly more accurate in boys compared to girls, while the reverse was true for the Demirjian revised seven-tooth and original four-tooth methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box-plot of mean DA-CA males aged 5-10 years
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-plot of mean DA-CA males aged 11-15 years
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box-plot of mean DA-CA females aged 5-10 years
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box-plot of mean DA-CA females aged 11-15 years
Figure 5
Figure 5
Box-plot of mean DA-CA females aged 11-15 years
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973. May;45(2):211–27. - PubMed
    1. Demirjian A, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol. 1976. Sep;3(5):411–21. 10.1080/03014467600001671 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akkaya N, Yilanci HÖ, Göksülük D. Applicability of Demirjian’s four methods and Willems method for age estimation in a sample of Turkish children. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015. Sep;17(5):355–9. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.04.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flood SJ, Franklin D, Turlach BA, McGeachie J. A comparison of Demirjian’s four dental development methods for forensic age estimation in south Australian sub-adults. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013. Oct;20(7):875–83. 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flood SJ, Mitchell WJ, Oxnard CE, Turlach BA, McGeachie J. A Comparison of Demirjian’s Four Dental Development Methods for Forensic Age Assessment. J Forensic Sci. 2011. Nov;56(6):1610–5. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01883.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types