Validation of a clinical rotation evaluation for physician assistant students
- PMID: 29866089
- PMCID: PMC5987424
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1242-y
Validation of a clinical rotation evaluation for physician assistant students
Abstract
Background: We conducted a prospective validation study to develop a physician assistant (PA) clinical rotation evaluation (PACRE) instrument. The specific aims of this study were to 1) develop a tool to evaluate PA clinical rotations, and 2) explore associations between validated rotation evaluation scores and characteristics of the students and rotations.
Methods: The PACRE was administered to rotating PA students at our institution in 2016. Factor analysis, internal consistency reliability, and associations between PACRE scores and student or rotation characteristics were determined.
Results: Of 206 PACRE instruments sent, 124 were returned (60.2% response). Factor analysis supported a unidimensional model with a mean (SD) score of 4.31 (0.57) on a 5-point scale. Internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach α=0.95). PACRE scores were associated with students' gender (P = .01) and rotation specialty (P = .006) and correlated with students' perception of being prepared (r = 0.32; P < .001) and value of the rotation (r = 0.57; P < .001).
Conclusions: This is the first validated instrument to evaluate PA rotation experiences. Application of the PACRE questionnaire could inform rotation directors about ways to improve clinical experiences. The findings of this study suggest that PA students must be adequately prepared to have a successful experience on their rotations. PA programs should consider offering transition courses like those offered in many medical schools to prepare their students for clinical experiences. Future research should explore whether additional rotation characteristics and educational outcomes are associated with PACRE scores.
Keywords: Assessment; Clinical rotation; Physician assistant education; Validation study.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. Given that the research was conducted in an established educational setting involving normal educational practices, the Mayo Clinic institutional review board did not require consent from the participants.
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparing Surgical Clerkship Performance of Medical and Physician Assistant Students.J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):466-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.006. Epub 2017 Feb 13. J Surg Educ. 2017. PMID: 28209501
-
Reliability and Validity of PAEA End of Rotation™ Examination Scores for Predicting Performance on the Physician Assistant National Certification Examination.J Physician Assist Educ. 2015 Dec;26(4):187-92. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000044. J Physician Assist Educ. 2015. PMID: 26599311
-
Interprofessional Education: What Measurable Learning Outcomes Are Realistic for the Physician Assistant Profession?J Physician Assist Educ. 2016 Jun;27(2):63-7. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000072. J Physician Assist Educ. 2016. PMID: 27123600
-
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015. Med Educ Online. 2015. PMID: 26511792 Free PMC article.
-
A Retrospective Review of Physician Assistant Education Association End of Rotation Examinations.J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Sep;29(3):158-161. doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000208. J Physician Assist Educ. 2018. PMID: 30028357 Review.
References
-
- Dall T, West T, Chakrabarti R, Iacobucci W; Association of American Medical Colleges. The complexities of physician supply and demand: 2016 update: projections from 2014 to 2025 [Internet]. 2016 Apr 5 [cited 2017 Sept 18]; [51 p.]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/download/458082/data/2016_complexities_of_supply_an...
-
- Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. Accredited Programs [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sept 18]. Available from: http://www.arc-pa.org/accreditation/accredited-programs/
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
