Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study
- PMID: 29866475
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30354-1
Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 953-64.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):e382. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30492-3. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30102231 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Twice a week carfilzomib at 27 mg/m2 is approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Phase 1/2 CHAMPION-1, the first study exploring once-weekly carfilzomib dosing, established the maximum tolerated dose at 70 mg/m2 in combination with dexamethasone. We aimed to compare progression-free survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma given once weekly carfilzomib or twice weekly carfilzomib.
Methods: In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. trial, we recruited patients (aged 18 years and older) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with two or three treatments, including a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent, from hospital, clinic, oncology or medical centres. Key eligibility criteria were refractory to most recent therapy (including bortezomib or ixazomib) with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive carfilzomib once a week (70 mg/m2) or twice a week (27 mg/m2). The randomisation sequence was generated using a validated randomisation software and implemented using an interactive response technology system that assigned patients to treatment sequentially based on the randomisation sequence as patients were enrolled at participating clinical sites. Patients were stratified by International Staging System stage at study entry or baseline, whether or not they were refractory to bortezomib treatment, and age (block size of 4). The once weekly group received carfilzomib (30 min intravenous infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of all cycles (20 mg/m2 day 1 [cycle 1]; 70 mg/m2 thereafter). The twice weekly group received carfilzomib (10 min intravenous infusion) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (20 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 during cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter). All patients received dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15 [all cycles] and 22 [cycles 1-9 only]). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival between groups in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analysis was done in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02412878, and is no longer enrolling patients.
Findings: Between September, 2015, and August, 2016, 578 patients were recruited from 118 sites. 478 patients were randomly assigned and included in the efficacy analyses (240 to receive once weekly carfilzomib; 238 to receive twice weekly carfilzomib). Median progression-free survival was higher in the once weekly group than the twice weekly group (11·2 months [95% CI 8·6-13·0] vs 7·6 months [5·8-9·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·54-0·83; p=0·0029). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events was higher in the once weekly group than the twice weekly group (68% [n=161] vs 62% [n=145]); the most common events were anaemia, pneumonia, and thrombocytopenia (42 [18%] vs 42 [18%], 24 [10%] vs 16 [7%], and 17 [7%] vs 16 [7%], respectively for once weekly carfilzomib vs twice weekly carfilzomib). A lower proportion of patients had grade 3 or worse cardiac failure in the once weekly group (7 [3%]) than in the twice weekly group (10 [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (2%) of 238 patients in the once weekly group (sepsis [n=1], death [n=1], acute lung injury [n=1], acute respiratory distress syndrome [n=1], and tumour lysis syndrome [n=1]) and in two (1%) of 235 patients in the twice weekly group (plasma cell myeloma [n=1] and congestive heart failure [n=1]). There were 58 deaths in the once weekly group and 68 deaths in the twice weekly group at the time of data cutoff.
Interpretation: Once weekly carfilzomib at 70 mg/m2 significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus the twice weekly schedule. Overall safety was comparable between the groups. Once weekly carfilzomib appears safe and more effective with a convenient dosing regimen versus the twice weekly schedule for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
Funding: Amgen, Inc.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
More convenient proteasome inhibition for improved outcomes.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):856-858. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30411-X. Epub 2018 Jun 1. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29866476 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1327-1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Lancet Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28843768 Clinical Trial.
-
Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study.Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7. Epub 2015 Dec 5. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26671818 Clinical Trial.
-
Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): updated outcomes from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00579-9. Epub 2021 Dec 3. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34871550 Clinical Trial.
-
Evolution of carfilzomib dose and schedule in patients with multiple myeloma: a historical overview.Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Jul;40(6):781-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 1. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014. PMID: 24630735 Review.
-
Carfilzomib: a second-generation proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jan;47(1):56-62. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R561. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Ann Pharmacother. 2013. PMID: 23300152 Review.
Cited by
-
Roadmap for new practitioners to navigate the multiple myeloma landscape.Heliyon. 2022 Sep 12;8(9):e10586. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10586. eCollection 2022 Sep. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 36164513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Timing of treatment of smoldering myeloma: early treatment.Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 13;2(21):3045-3049. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018021220. Blood Adv. 2018. PMID: 30425068 Free PMC article.
-
Weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1b study.Am J Hematol. 2019 Jul;94(7):794-802. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25498. Epub 2019 May 13. Am J Hematol. 2019. PMID: 31021005 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The pharmacologic management of multiple myeloma in older adults.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 May;20(7):887-902. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1577822. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019. PMID: 30785310 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Novel Agents in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 9;13(22):5606. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225606. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34830761 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical