Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Jun 4;190(22):E669-E676.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170588.

Patient, family and provider experiences with transfers from intensive care unit to hospital ward: a multicentre qualitative study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient, family and provider experiences with transfers from intensive care unit to hospital ward: a multicentre qualitative study

Chloe de Grood et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Transfer of patient care from an intensive care unit (ICU) to a hospital ward is often challenging, high risk and inefficient. We assessed patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators to high-quality transfers and recommendations to improve the transfer process.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews of participants from a multicentre prospective cohort study of ICU transfers conducted at 10 hospitals across Canada. We purposively sampled 1 patient, 1 family member of a patient, 1 ICU provider, and 1 ward provider at each of the 8 English-speaking sites. Qualitative content analysis was used to derive themes, subthemes and recommendations.

Results: The 35 participants described 3 interrelated, overarching themes perceived as barriers or facilitators to high-quality patient transfers: resource availability, communication and institutional culture. Common recommendations suggested to improve ICU transfers included implementing standardized communication tools that streamline provider-provider and provider-patient communication, using multimodal communication to facilitate timely, accurate, durable and mutually reinforcing information transfer; and developing procedures to manage delays in transfer to ensure continuity of care for patients in the ICU waiting for a hospital ward bed.

Interpretation: Patient and provider perspectives attribute breakdown of ICU-to-ward transfers of care to resource availability, communication and institutional culture. Patients and providers recommend standardized, multimodal communication and transfer procedures to improve quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Sean Bagshaw reports personal fees from Baxter Healthcare, outside the submitted work. No other competing interests were declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram of selection of patients for interview.

References

    1. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Peterson LA, et al. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:2030–6. - PubMed
    1. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Vesin A, et al. OUTCOMEREA Study Group. Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study: parts I and II. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:134–42. - PubMed
    1. Camiré E, Moyen E, Stelfox HT. Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure. CMAJ 2009;180:936–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hua M, Gong MN, Brady J, et al. Early and late unplanned rehospitalizations for survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med 2015;43:430–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naylor M, Brooten D, Jones R, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning for the hospitalized elderly. A randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:999–1006. - PubMed

Publication types