Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 4;19(6):1658.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19061658.

The Pattern of Signatures in Gastric Cancer Prognosis

Affiliations
Review

The Pattern of Signatures in Gastric Cancer Prognosis

Julita Machlowska et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and it is a fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Carcinogenesis is a multistage disease process specified by the gradual procurement of mutations and epigenetic alterations in the expression of different genes, which finally lead to the occurrence of a malignancy. These genes have diversified roles regarding cancer development. Intracellular pathways are assigned to the expression of different genes, signal transduction, cell-cycle supervision, genomic stability, DNA repair, and cell-fate destination, like apoptosis, senescence. Extracellular pathways embrace tumour invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis. Altered expression patterns, leading the different clinical responses. This review highlights the list of molecular biomarkers that can be used for prognostic purposes and provide information on the likely outcome of the cancer disease in an untreated individual.

Keywords: HER2; apoptosis; cell cycle regulators; gastric cancer; invasiveness; microsatellite instability; mucins; multidrug resistance proteins; neovascularization; peritoneal spreading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Peritoneal dissemination steps and molecular markers.

References

    1. Zhang X., Zhang P. Gastric cancer: Somatic genetics as a guide to therapy. J. Med. Genet. 2017;54:305–312. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franz J.L., Cruz A.B., Jr. The treatment of gastric cancer with combined surgical resection and chemotherapy. J. Surg. Oncol. 1977;9:131–137. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930090206. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coburn N., Cosby R., Klein L., Knight G., Malthaner R., Mamazza J., Mercer C.D., Ringash J. Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018;63:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilke H., Preusser P., Fink U., Gunzer U., Meyer H.J., Meyer J., Siewert J.R., Achterrath W., Lenaz L., Knipp H. Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: A phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. J. Clin. Oncol. 1989;7:1318–1326. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1318. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelsen D., Karpeh M., Schwartz G., Gerdes H., Lightdale C., Botet J., Lauers G., Klimstra D., Huang Y., Saltz L., et al. Neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk gastric cancer: A phase II trial of preoperative FAMTX and postoperative intraperitoneal fluorouracil-cisplatin plus intravenous fluorouracil. J. Clin. Oncol. 1996;14:1818–1828. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1818. - DOI - PubMed

Substances