Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 9:9:300.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00300. eCollection 2018.

Upper Limb Kinematics in Stroke and Healthy Controls Using Target-to-Target Task in Virtual Reality

Affiliations

Upper Limb Kinematics in Stroke and Healthy Controls Using Target-to-Target Task in Virtual Reality

Netha Hussain et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Kinematic analysis using virtual reality (VR) environment provides quantitative assessment of upper limb movements. This technique has rarely been used in evaluating motor function in stroke despite its availability in stroke rehabilitation.

Objective: To determine the discriminative validity of VR-based kinematics during target-to-target pointing task in individuals with mild or moderate arm impairment following stroke and in healthy controls.

Methods: Sixty-seven participants with moderate (32-57 points) or mild (58-65 points) stroke impairment as assessed with Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity were included from the Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg-SALGOT cohort of non-selected individuals within the first year of stroke. The stroke groups and 43 healthy controls performed the target-to-target pointing task, where 32 circular targets appear one after the other and disappear when pointed at by the haptic handheld stylus in a three-dimensional VR environment. The kinematic parameters captured by the stylus included movement time, velocities, and smoothness of movement.

Results: The movement time, mean velocity, and peak velocity were discriminative between groups with moderate and mild stroke impairment and healthy controls. The movement time was longer and mean and peak velocity were lower for individuals with stroke. The number of velocity peaks, representing smoothness, was also discriminative and significantly higher in both stroke groups (mild, moderate) compared to controls. Movement trajectories in stroke more frequently showed clustering (spider's web) close to the target indicating deficits in movement precision.

Conclusion: The target-to-target pointing task can provide valuable and specific information about sensorimotor impairment of the upper limb following stroke that might not be captured using traditional clinical scale.

Trial registration details: The trial was registered with register number NCT01115348 at clinicaltrials.gov, on May 4, 2010. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01115348.

Keywords: discriminative validity; kinematics; movement; outcome assessment; rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the inclusion process. Abbreviations: SALGOT, Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at Gothenburg University; FMA-UE, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A participant wearing 3D glasses and performing the target-to-target task using the haptic device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Velocity–time profile of a movement segment shown for one individual with moderate stroke impairment (A) and one healthy control (B). The velocity peaks are marked using asterisk symbols.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trajectory of one movement segment in 3D space shown for one individual with moderate stroke impairment (solid line) and one healthy control (dashed line). The asterisk marks the start and the circle marks the end of the movement segment.

References

    1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke (2001) 32(6):1279–84.10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1279 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Støier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: outcome. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil (1995) 76(5):399–405.10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80567-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Persson HC. Upper Extremity Functioning During the First Year After Stroke [Thesis]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; (2015).
    1. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil (2009) 21(8):357–64.10.1080/096382899297459 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, Weir C, Langhorne P. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil (2012) 26(4):291–313.10.1177/0269215511420305 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources