Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 17:10:310-316.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.04.011. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening

Patricia Markham Risica  1   2   3 , Natalie H Matthews  4 , Laura Dionne  1 , Jennifer Mello  1 , Laura K Ferris  5 , Melissa Saul  5 , Alan C Geller  6 , Francis Solano  5 , John M Kirkwood  6 , Martin A Weinstock  3   4   7
Affiliations

Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening

Patricia Markham Risica et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Screening for melanoma may save lives, but may also cause patient distress. One key reason that preventative visual skin examinations for skin cancer are not currently recommended is the inadequate available evidence to assess potential harm to psychosocial wellbeing. We investigated potential psychological harms and benefits of skin examinations by conducting telephone surveys in 2015 of 187 screened participants; all were ≥35 years old. Participants had their skin examined by practitioners who had completed INFORMED, a validated web-based training for detection of skin cancers, particularly melanoma. Participants underwent the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Psychological Consequences of Screening (PCQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Analyses were conducted in 2017. Of the entire study sample, 40% were thoroughly screened as determined by patient-reported level of undress and skin areas examined. Participants who were thoroughly screened: did not differ on negative psychosocial measures; scored higher on measures of positive psychosocial wellbeing (PCQ); and were more motivated to conduct monthly self-examinations and seek annual clinician skin examinations, compared to other participants (p < 0.05). Importantly, thoroughly screened patients were more likely to report skin prevention practices (skin self-examinations to identify a concerning lesion, practitioner provided skin exam), recommend skin examinations to peers, and feel satisfied with their skin cancer education than less thoroughly screened individuals (p < 0.01). Our results suggest that visual screening for skin cancer does not worsen patient psychosocial wellbeing and may be associated with improved skin cancer-related practices and attitudes.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer prevention; Melanoma; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram for patients contacted for baseline and follow-up surveys.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Participants “very likely” to perform prevention practices by baseline and follow-up screening status.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aitken J.F., Elwood M., Baade P.D., Youl P., English D. Clinical whole-body skin examination reduces the incidence of thick melanomas. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;126(2):450–458. - PubMed
    1. Aitken J.F., Elwood J.M., Lowe J.B., Firman D.W., Balanda K.P., Ring I.T. A randomised trial of population screening for melanoma. J. Med. Screen. 2002;9(1):33–37. - PubMed
    1. Aitken J.F., Janda M., Elwood M., Youl P.H., Ring I.T., Lowe J.B. Clinical outcomes from skin screening clinics within a community-based melanoma screening program. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006;54(1):105–114. - PubMed
    1. Aneja S., Aneja S., Bordeaux J.S. Association of increased dermatologist density with lower melanoma mortality. Arch. Dermatol. 2012;148(2):174–178. - PubMed
    1. Balch C.M., Gershenwald J.E., Soong S.J., Thompson J.F. Update on the melanoma staging system: the importance of sentinel node staging and primary tumor mitotic rate. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011;104(4):379–385. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources