Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;26(12):4049-4055.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4272-4. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

Cancer survivors in the workplace: sleep disturbance mediates the impact of cancer on healthcare expenditures and work absenteeism

Affiliations

Cancer survivors in the workplace: sleep disturbance mediates the impact of cancer on healthcare expenditures and work absenteeism

Brian D Gonzalez et al. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: History of cancer is significantly associated with increases in healthcare costs, worse work performance, and higher absenteeism in the workplace. This is particularly important as most cancer survivors return to employment. Sleep disturbance is a largely overlooked potential contributor to these changes.

Methods: Data from 9488 state employees participating in the Kansas State employee wellness program were used to assess cancer history, sleep disturbance, healthcare expenditures, work performance ratings, and absenteeism. Participants were categorized as having had no history of breast or prostate cancer, a past history only with no current cancer treatment, or current treatment for breast or prostate cancer. Indirect mediation analyses determined whether sleep disturbance mediated the influence of cancer status on outcomes.

Results: Employees receiving treatment for breast or prostate cancer had significantly greater healthcare expenditures and absenteeism than those with a past history or no history of cancer (ps < .0001). Sleep disturbance significantly mediated the impact of cancer on healthcare expenditures and absenteeism (ps < .05), accounting for 2 and 8% of the impact of cancer on healthcare expenditure and missed full days of work, respectively.

Conclusions: The worse outcomes observed among employees receiving treatment for breast and prostate cancer, the most common forms of cancer among women and men, were partially explained by the impacts of cancer and treatment for cancer on sleep disturbance. These findings suggest that preventing or addressing sleep disturbance may result in economic benefits in addition to improvements in health and quality of life.

Keywords: Absenteeism; Cancer; Healthcare costs; Quality of life; Sleep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Indirect mediation analysis results Note: Path estimates and 95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals obtained with the PROCESS macro version 3.0. The path estimates from cancer status to sleep disturbance, from sleep disturbance to the outcome, and from cancer status to the outcome are the a, b, and c’ (direct effect) paths, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2016–2017. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
    1. Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, Mariotto A (2011) Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 20 (10):2006–2014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 66 (1):7–30 - PubMed
    1. Mehnert A (2011) Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 77 (2):109–130. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (2006) Employment, Insurance, and Economic Issues In: Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E (eds) From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 363–342