Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;6(6):e1.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00115.

Neurological Outcome After Traumatic Transverse Sacral Fractures: A Systematic Review of 521 Patients Reported in the Literature

D H R Kempen  1 , D Delawi  2 , M C Altena  1 , M C Kruyt  3 , M P J van den Bekerom  1 , F C Oner  3 , R W Poolman  1
Affiliations

Neurological Outcome After Traumatic Transverse Sacral Fractures: A Systematic Review of 521 Patients Reported in the Literature

D H R Kempen et al. JBJS Rev. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the neurological outcome after transverse sacral fractures in patients with neurological impairment.

Methods: A systematic review of the English, French, German, and Dutch literature was conducted. All study designs, including retrospective cohort studies and case reports, describing transverse sacral fractures were included. Two authors independently extracted the predefined data and scored the neurological impairment according to the Gibbons classification after the trauma and at the time of follow-up. The neurological outcomes were pooled according to the Gibbons classification.

Results: No randomized controlled trials or prospective case series were found. A total of 139 articles were included, consisting of 81 case reports and 58 retrospective case series involving 521 patients. Regardless of the type of management, neurological recovery of at least 1 Gibbons category was reported in 62% of these patients. A comparison of the neurological outcome of nonoperatively treated patients and surgically treated patients showed similar neurological recovery rates. For the surgically treated patients, fixation of the fracture resulted in a better neurological improvement compared with an isolated decompression.

Conclusions: This review could not provide evidence of improved neurological recovery after surgical treatment compared with nonoperative treatment. When surgical treatment was considered, there was a low level of evidence that fixation of the fracture results in better neurological improvement compared with isolated decompression.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Feb;227:67-81.
    1. Robles LA. Transverse sacral fractures. Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):60-9. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
    1. Robles LA, Plantillas E. An unusual transverse sacral fracture treated with early decompression. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):546-9.
    1. Dussa CU, Soni BM. Influence of type of management of transverse sacral fractures on neurological outcome. A case series and review of literature. Spinal Cord. 2008 Sep;46(9):590-4. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
    1. Bederman SS, Hassan JM, Shah KN, Kiester PD, Bhatia NN, Zamorano DP. Fixation techniques for complex traumatic transverse sacral fractures: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15;38(16):E1028-40.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources