Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
- PMID: 29871645
- PMCID: PMC5989420
- DOI: 10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x
Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?
Abstract
Background: Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in 2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveries among all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality is still highly uncertain. The objective of this study was to observe whether there was an increase or a decrease in urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after the free C-section policy was introduced.
Methods: We used data from three consecutive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): 2001, 2006 and 2011-2012 in Benin and 2001, 2006 and 2012-13 in Mali. We evaluated trends in inequality in terms of two outcomes: C-sections and facility based deliveries. Adjusted odds ratios were used to estimate whether the distributions of C-sections and facility based deliveries favoured the least advantaged categories (rural, non-educated and poorest women) or the most advantaged categories (urban, educated and richest women). Concentration curves were used to observe the degree of wealth-related inequality in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries.
Results: We analysed 47,302 childbirths (23,266 in Benin and 24,036 in Mali). In Benin, we found no significant difference in access to C-sections between urban and rural women or between educated and non-educated women. However, the richest women had greater access to C-sections than the poorest women. There was no significant change in these inequalities in terms of access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after introduction of the free C-section policy. In Mali, we found a reduction in education-related inequalities in access to C-sections after implementation of the policy (p-value = 0.043). Inequalities between urban and rural areas had already decreased prior to implementation of the policy, but wealth-related inequalities were still present.
Conclusions: Urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in C-section access did not change substantially after the countries implemented free C-section policies. User fee exemption is not enough. We recommend switching to mechanisms that combine both a universal approach and targeted action for vulnerable populations to address this issue and ensure equal health care access for all individuals.
Keywords: Benin; Caesarean section; Health equity; Health policy; Low-income countries; Mali; Maternal health; User fees.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
VR has served as a consultant on the issue of user fee abolition to non-governmental organizations in West Africa.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Cost and impact of policies to remove and reduce fees for obstetric care in Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali and Morocco.Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 2;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0412-y. Int J Equity Health. 2016. PMID: 27483993 Free PMC article.
-
Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone.Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;135:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 2. Soc Sci Med. 2015. PMID: 25965892
-
User fee exemptions and equity in access to caesarean sections: an analysis of patient survey data in Mali.Int J Equity Health. 2012 Aug 29;11:49. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-49. Int J Equity Health. 2012. PMID: 22931249 Free PMC article.
-
User fee policies and women's empowerment: a systematic scoping review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05835-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33109172 Free PMC article.
-
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. Lancet. 2018. PMID: 30322584 Review.
Cited by
-
Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Beliefs on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cesarean Section: A Mixed-Methods Study in Benin.Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;11(7):872. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070872. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35884126 Free PMC article.
-
Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 29;21(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07386-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34965864 Free PMC article.
-
Catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment after caesarean section in Sierra Leone: An evaluation of the free health care initiative.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0258532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258532. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34653191 Free PMC article.
-
Improving healthcare accessibility for pregnant women and children in the context of health system strengthening initiatives and terrorist attacks in Central Mali: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 2;7(Suppl 9):e012816. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012816. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 38697656 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Coverage and Content of Maternal and Neonatal Care in Bamako, Mali.J Urban Health. 2024 Nov;101(Suppl 1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00931-2. Epub 2024 Nov 22. J Urban Health. 2024. PMID: 39576498 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller A-B, Barros AJD, Boerma T, et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2018;360 Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k55.abstract. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical