Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):6335-6340.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802314115. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

High-resolution μCT of a mouse embryo using a compact laser-driven X-ray betatron source

Affiliations

High-resolution μCT of a mouse embryo using a compact laser-driven X-ray betatron source

Jason M Cole et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

In the field of X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) there is a growing need to reduce acquisition times at high spatial resolution (approximate micrometers) to facilitate in vivo and high-throughput operations. The state of the art represented by synchrotron light sources is not practical for certain applications, and therefore the development of high-brightness laboratory-scale sources is crucial. We present here imaging of a fixed embryonic mouse sample using a compact laser-plasma-based X-ray light source and compare the results to images obtained using a commercial X-ray μCT scanner. The radiation is generated by the betatron motion of electrons inside a dilute and transient plasma, which circumvents the flux limitations imposed by the solid or liquid anodes used in conventional electron-impact X-ray tubes. This X-ray source is pulsed (duration <30 fs), bright (>1010 photons per pulse), small (diameter <1 μm), and has a critical energy >15 keV. Stable X-ray performance enabled tomographic imaging of equivalent quality to that of the μCT scanner, an important confirmation of the suitability of the laser-driven source for applications. The X-ray flux achievable with this approach scales with the laser repetition rate without compromising the source size, which will allow the recording of high-resolution μCT scans in minutes.

Keywords: X-ray imaging; laser–plasma acceleration; microcomputed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the laser and X-ray beamlines. The laser beam (red) is incident upon a gas cell, producing an electron beam (blue) and an X-ray beam (green). All components are inside a vacuum chamber with the exception of the X-ray camera. The sample is kept at atmospheric pressure inside a secondary chamber.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Characterization of the laser-betatron X-ray beam. (A) Measured transmission through metallic filters, with overlaid equivalent thicknesses of water in centimeters at this X-ray energy. (B) Distribution of X-ray critical energies Ecrit recorded during the tomographic scan. (C) Measured line-spread function (LSF) of the X-ray detector. (D) Integrated X-ray beam dose profile measured at the sample position using EBT3 radiochromic film irradiated with 100 X-ray pulses.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Tomographic imaging of a 14.5-dpc mouse embryo. (A–D) Single X-ray projections (A and B) and sagittal slices from 3D reconstruction (C and D). A and C were acquired with the laser-betatron source and B and D with a commercial microfocus scanner.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
An isosurface rendering of the reconstruction from the laser source is depicted in gray. A sagittal slice of the reconstruction is overlaid in blue. Enlarged sections of sagittal, coronal, and transverse slices around the heart and liver are plotted in A and B, respectively. (Scale bars, 1 mm.)
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
The average photon flux and characteristic energy of the X-ray source described here in comparison with previous results on laser-betatron X-ray sources (, , –21). The lines represent the incident photon flux on a typical 4-MP detector after passing through 1 cm of water, assuming the X-ray beam fills the detector.

References

    1. Mangles SPD, et al. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser-plasma interactions. Nature. 2004;431:535–538. - PubMed
    1. Geddes CGR, et al. High-quality electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator using plasma-channel guiding. Nature. 2004;431:538–541. - PubMed
    1. Faure J, et al. A laser-plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature. 2004;431:541–544. - PubMed
    1. Tajima T, Dawson JM. Laser electron accelerator. Phys Rev Lett. 1979;43:267–270.
    1. Esarey E, Schroeder CB, Leemans WP. Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev Mod Phys. 2009;81:1229–1285.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources