Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 5;8(1):8652.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26984-3.

GM-CSF targeted immunomodulation affects host response to M. tuberculosis infection

Affiliations

GM-CSF targeted immunomodulation affects host response to M. tuberculosis infection

Sulayman Benmerzoug et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Host directed immunomodulation represents potential new adjuvant therapies in infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. Major cytokines like TNFα exert a multifold role in host control of mycobacterial infections. GM-CSF and its receptor are over-expressed during acute M. tuberculosis infection and we asked how GM-CSF neutralization might affect host response, both in immunocompetent and in immunocompromised TNFα-deficient mice. GM-CSF neutralizing antibodies, at a dose effectively preventing acute lung inflammation, did not affect M. tuberculosis bacterial burden, but increased the number of granuloma in wild-type mice. We next assessed whether GM-CSF neutralization might affect the control of M. tuberculosis by isoniazid/rifampicin chemotherapy. GM-CSF neutralization compromised the bacterial control under sub-optimal isoniazid/rifampicin treatment in TNFα-deficient mice, leading to exacerbated lung inflammation with necrotic granulomatous structures and high numbers of intracellular M. tuberculosis bacilli. In vitro, GM-CSF neutralization promoted M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype in M. bovis BCG infected macrophages, with reduced mycobactericidal NO production and higher intracellular M. bovis BCG burden. Thus, GM-CSF pathway overexpression during acute M. tuberculosis infection contributes to an efficient M1 response, and interfering with GM-CSF pathway in the course of infection may impair the host inflammatory response against M. tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Increased pulmonary GM-CSF after acute airway inflammation and M. tuberculosis infection in vivo. WT mice were challenged intranasally with saline or LPS (1 µg/mouse) and GM-CSF levels in lung (A) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (B) were measured after 24 h by ELISA. Pulmonary concentration of GM-CSF protein was measured 1 and 3 months (C) after in vivo M. tuberculosis infection (1000 ± 200 CFU/mouse i.n.) in WT mice, of after 1 month in WT and TNFα−/− mice (D). Data are representative of two independent experiments and are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5–8 mice per group). The expression of GM-CSF receptor β subunits genes Csf2rb1 (E) and of Csfrb2 (F) in the lungs 4 weeks post-M. tuberculosis infection in WT and in TNFα−/− mice was analyzed by microarray. Each group of infected mice has been statistically compared to the uninfected mice of the same phenotype. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
GM-CSF neutralization reduces inflammatory cell recruitment to the airways. WT mice were untreated or pre-treated with anti GM-CSF neutralizing antibody (Clone B2.6, 200 µg per mouse i.p.) 1 hour prior to LPS exposure (1 µg/mouse i.n.). Neutrophils (A), monocytes (B) and lymphocytes (C) recruitment were quantified in the BAL fluid after 24 h. The lung levels of CXCL1 (D), TNFα (E), IL-1β (F), Myeloperoxidase activity (G) and BAL levels of MMP9 (H) and TIMP1 (I) were measured. Lungs tissue was fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde and HE staining is shown with a scoring of inflammatory cell recruitment and emphysema (J). Data are from two independent experiments (n = 4–9 mice per group) and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons are presented between groups as indicated. ****p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; ns, p > 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
GM-CSF neutralization during M. tuberculosis infection. WT or TNFα−/− mice infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv (1000 ± 200 CFU/mouse i.n.) received either GM-CSF neutralizing MAB (Clone A7.39, 200 µg per mouse i.p.) or IgG2b isotype control on day 14 and 21 post-infection and relative body weight gain was recorded (A,C). Bacterial burden was determined in the lungs on day 26 for TNFα−/− mice and on day 32 for WT mice (B,D). Data are from two independent experiments (n = 5–9 mice per group) and are expressed as mean values ± SEM. No statistical difference between the groups were observed (p > 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of GM-CSF blockade on granuloma integrity and bacterial burden. WT (A) or TNFα−/− mice (B) infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv received either GM-CSF neutralizing MAB or IgG2b isotype control on day 14 and 21 post-infection, as in Fig. 3. Lungs from infected mice were fixed, and HE (Left panels) and ZN (Middle panels) staining performed at day 26 for TNFα−/− mice and day 32 for WT mice post-infection. Black arrows point to acid-alcohol resistant bacilli. A scoring of cell infiltration and necrosis is shown (Right panels). The number of granuloma per mm² and surface of granulomatous lesions (expressed as %) were quantified on digitalized sections. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. (n = 4–5 mice per group). Statistically significant comparisons are presented. *p < 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
GM-CSF neutralization during treatment of M. tuberculosis infection by sub-optimal chemotherapy. WT and TNFα−/− mice were infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv (1000 ± 200 CFU/mouse i.n.) and untreated or treated with increasing doses of antibiotics (INH/RIF) in drinking water from day 14 to day 35 post-infection, as indicated. Relative body weight gain was recorded (A) and lung bacterial burden was measured on day 26, 32 and 78 post-infection for antibiotics doses of 1, 10 and 100 mg/L, respectively (B). Anti GM-CSF antibody (Clone A7.39, 200 µg per mouse i.p.) or IgG2b isotype control was combined with chemotherapy during M. tuberculosis infection. INH/RIF were administered from day 14 to day 32 post-infection and anti GM-CSF MAB administered once a week for two weeks, on day 14 and day 21 post-infection (C). The relative bodyweight (D) and lung bacterial burden were measured after INH/RIF 10 mg/L (E) treatments. The lung levels of IL-12p40 (F) and IFNγ (G) were measured by ELISA at day 26 post-infection after INH/RIF 10 mg/L treatment. Data expressed as mean values ± SEM (n = 4–6 mice per group). Statistical comparisons are presented as compared to isotype control treated mice, unless otherwise indicated (B). ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05, ns, p > 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of GM-CSF blockade combined with sub-optimal chemotherapy on granuloma integrity and lung bacterial burden. TNFα−/− mice were infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv (1000 ± 200 CFU/mouse i.n.), treated or not with 10 mg/L of antibiotics (INH/RIF) in drinking water from day 14 to day 32 post-infection and GM-CSF was neutralized by anti GM-CSF MAB, as indicated in Fig. 5C. On day 32 post-infection, lungs from infected mice were fixed, and stained for HE (A) or ZN (B). A scoring of cell infiltration and necrosis is shown, together with the surface of granulomatous lesions, free alveolar space, number of M. tuberculosis (M. tb) clusters per mm² and number of bacilli per cluster were quantified on digitalized sections (C). Blacks arrows points to acid-alcohol resistant bacilli. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–6 mice per group). Statistical comparisons are presented as compared to isotype control treated mice. **p < 0.01.
Figure 7
Figure 7
In vitro GM-CSF neutralization induces a switch towards M2 macrophage polarization profile after mycobacterial infection. Mannose receptor CD206 expression was determined by flow cytometry in macrophages treated with GM-CSF neutralizing MAB (Clone A7.39) or IgG2b isotype control (1 µg/mL) and either unstimulated (medium), or stimulated with M. bovis BCG (M.O.I.:2) or LPS (100 ng/mL) during 24 hours. CD11b+ cells were pre-gated and F4/80+CD206+ double positive cells were selected, as shown on representative dot blots (A), together with cell frequency (B). Histograms (C) and MFI (D) of BMDMs treated with anti GM-CSF MAB (blue lines) or IgG2b isotype control (red lines) and labeled with rat anti-mouse CD206-APC (clone MR5D3) antibodies are shown, as compared to isotype control (grey). Data are expressed as mean ± SD of n = 2 independent cultures. M1 and M2-related genes expression was measured in macrophages after 24 hours of stimulation. The mRNA levels of nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2, E), arginase 1 (Arg1, F), chitinase-like 3 (Ym1, G), CD206 mannose receptor, C type 1 (Mrc1, H) and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3, I) were analyzed by RT-qPCR. The fold change of mRNA levels, normalized to Gapdh level in medium, is shown. Data are from two independent experiments and are expressed as mean values ± SEM of n = 4 independent cultures. Statistical comparisons are presented as compared to isotype control treated cells. ****p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Figure 8
Figure 8
In vitro GM-CSF blockade is deleterious for nitric oxide production and mycobacterial killing. Macrophages treated with GM-CSF neutralizing MAB (Clone A7.39) or IgG2b isotype control (1 µg/mL) were either unstimulated (medium), or infected with M. bovis BCG-GFP (MOI:4) during 24 hours. After 24 hours, NO production was quantified in cell supernatant using Griess reaction (A) and TNFα (B), IL12p40 (C) and IL-10 (D) levels were quantified by ELISA. Infected macrophages were also fixed in paraformaldehyde 4% during 10 minutes and mounted on slides using Fluoromount® (E). Cells were observed in confocal microscopy at 63x magnitude. A quantification of GFP+ M. bovis BCG per cell is shown (F). Six additional fields with individual cells infected with BCG-GFP in the presence of anti GM-CSF MAB or isotype control are shown (G). Data are expressed as mean ± SD of n = 2 independent cultures (AD) or n = 26–32 individual cells (F). Statistical comparisons are presented as compared to non-infected cells or in between groups treated with GM-CSF neutralizing MAB, as indicated. ****p < 0.0001, ND, Not Detected.

References

    1. Dheda K, et al. Global control of tuberculosis: from extensively drug-resistant to untreatable tuberculosis. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2014;2:321–338. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70031-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singhal, A. et al. Metformin as adjunct antituberculosis therapy. Science translational medicine6, 263ra159, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009885 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Zumla A, et al. Host-directed therapies for infectious diseases: current status, recent progress, and future prospects. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 2016;16:e47–63. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00078-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Connor G, et al. Sharpening nature’s tools for efficient tuberculosis control: A review of the potential role and development of host-directed therapies and strategies for targeted respiratory delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2016;102:33–54. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang Z, et al. How dormant is Mycobacterium tuberculosis during latency? A study integrating genomics and molecular epidemiology. Infection, genetics and evolution: journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases. 2011;11:1164–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources