Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;19(2):139-142.
doi: 10.7181/acfs.2018.00017. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Multiple foreign bodies causing an orocutaneous fistula of the cheek

Affiliations

Multiple foreign bodies causing an orocutaneous fistula of the cheek

Woo Ju Kim et al. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Foreign bodies impacted in the maxillofacial region are often a diagnostic challenge. They can be a source of chronic inflammatory reactions and infections leading to the formation of an orocutaneous fistula. Such orocutaneous fistulas cause significant morbidity in most patients, eventually requiring surgery. Recently, we encountered a very rare case of an orocutaneous fistula caused by multiple foreign bodies in the cheek. Precise removal of the foreign bodies was required, and a double-sided anterolateral thigh free flap was used to reconstruct the defect. Surgeons should be aware of the complications of multiple foreign bodies and should be able to diagnose these on careful clinical examination.

Keywords: Flap; Foreign body; Orocutaneous fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A 75-year-old male patient presented with an orocutaneous fistula on the right cheek. (A) Profile view. (B) Oral view showing the internal opening of the orocutaneous fistula.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Preoperative radiographic findings showing impacted foreign bodies (red circled areas). (A) Plain radiography, lateral view. (B) Computed tomography, coronal view.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Retrieved foreign bodies during the operation: 22 linear metal needles (each needle was 4 mm in length).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Recurrent orocutaneous fistula with an even bigger opening at the same location.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Postoperative view with a double-sided anterolateral thigh free flap. (A) Immediate postoperative view. (B) Two-year postoperative view.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bede SY, Ahmed FT. Management of retained foreign bodies in missile injuries of the maxillofacial region. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1440–4. - PubMed
    1. Auluck A, Behanan AG, Pai KM, Shetty C. Recurrent sinus of the cheek due to a retained foreign body: report of an unusual case. Br Dent J. 2005;198:337–9. - PubMed
    1. Raman R, Ariayanayagam C. Closure of orocutaneous and pharyngocutaneous fistulas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79:310. - PubMed
    1. Naude GP, Bongard FS, Demetriades D. Trauma secrets. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2003.
    1. McLean JN, Nicholas C, Duggal P, Chen A, Grist WG, Losken A, et al. Surgical management of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:442–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources