Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 26;8(10):5164-5172.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.4032. eCollection 2018 May.

Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds

Affiliations

Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds

Gary D Clewley et al. Ecol Evol. .

Abstract

Mist netting is the most commonly used method for catching birds for scientific ringing, but despite decades of use, there have been few attempts to quantify the associated potential risks to the individuals caught. Any incidence of mortality through capture and handling, however low, is of potential ethical concern and may also introduce biases into the data. We estimate the mortality rate associated with capture of previously ringed (recaptured) passerines from the British and Irish Ringing Scheme (c. 1.5 million records) caught using mist nets. The importance of species, age, mass, month, time, previous captures, and an index of predator occurrence was tested using generalized linear mixed-effects models. The average mortality rate was 0.0011, most of which was reported to occur before the individuals had been extracted from the nets (c. 70% of incidents). Juveniles appeared to be at higher risk and the incidence of predation from mist nets was seasonal, with increased risk during the winter. Species differed in their reported mortality rates with the apparent risk being greatest for Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita (0.0029) and Bullfinch Pyrrhula pyrrhula (0.0027). To improve our understanding (and hence minimize risk in future), we recommend collecting more complete data on incidences of mortality, and also injuries; exercising increased care when the species we have identified as being at greater risk are likely to be captured, and ensuring there are robust procedures for the checking of nets (as most reported incidents of mortality occur before handling). We also recommend that all Ringing Schemes should collate and make available data on capture-related mortality. Overall rates of mortality associated with capture, although, were low and support the use of mist netting as a safe capture technique, without undue bias from mortality, when used by appropriately trained individuals.

Keywords: avian; bird ringing; injury; mark–recapture; mortality; passerine; trapping; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mist nets are widely used to catch passerine birds in scrub and other habitats
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated average rate of individuals reported to have been killed by predators when in mist nets in each month, back‐transformed (inverse logit) from top selected logistic regression model; bars indicate ±1SE

References

    1. Al Rubiaee, Z. , Al‐Murayati, H. , & Møller, A. P. (2017). Recapture probability, flight morphology, and microorganisms. Current Zoology, zox030. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amat, J. A. (1999). Foot losses of metal banded snowy plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus). Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 555–557.
    1. Anderson, G. Q. , & Green, R. E. (2009). The value of ringing for bird conservation. Ringing & Migration, 24, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2009.9674393 - DOI
    1. Anon (2012). Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Animal Behaviour, 83, 301–309. - PubMed
    1. Arnemo, J. M. , Ahlqvist, P. , Andersen, R. , Berntsen, F. , Ericsson, G. , Odden, J. , … Swenson, J. E. (2006). Risk of capture related mortality in large free‐ranging mammals: Experiences from Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology, 12, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[109:ROCMIL]2.0.CO;2 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources