Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Dec;31(6):358-371.
doi: 10.1089/jamp.2018.1454. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

In Vitro Tests for Aerosol Deposition. VI: Realistic Testing with Different Mouth-Throat Models and In Vitro-In Vivo Correlations for a Dry Powder Inhaler, Metered Dose Inhaler, and Soft Mist Inhaler

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In Vitro Tests for Aerosol Deposition. VI: Realistic Testing with Different Mouth-Throat Models and In Vitro-In Vivo Correlations for a Dry Powder Inhaler, Metered Dose Inhaler, and Soft Mist Inhaler

Xiangyin Wei et al. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background:In vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) for lung deposition may be established by testing inhalers in vitro with realistic mouth-throat (MT) models and inhalation profiles (IP). This study was designed to compare the currently available MT models and their ability to predict in vivo lung deposition. Methods: Budelin® Novolizer®, Ventolin® Evohaler®, and Respimat® fenoterol were chosen to represent a dry powder inhaler (DPI), metered dose inhaler (MDI), and soft mist inhaler (SMI) in tests using eight MT models: small, medium, and large Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) models; small, medium, and large oropharyngeal consortium (OPC) models, the medium adult Alberta Idealized Throat (AIT), and the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Induction Port, with IPs that simulated those used by volunteers in lung scintigraphy studies. Drug deposition in MT was compared across the models, and IVIVCs evaluated by comparing values for total lung dose in vitro (TLDin vitro) to those reported in the clinic. Results: MT deposition was dependent on both the flow condition and MT geometry for all the inhalers, while the deposition rank order was independent of both factors. The overall ranking was USP <OPCL <AIT <VCUL <VCUM <OPCM <VCUS <OPCS. All model groups (VCU, OPC, AIT, and USP) produced TLDin vitro comparable with TLDin vivo for the DPI, where flow conditions dominated aerosol deposition. Only the VCU and OPC models produced good IVIVCs for the MDI, where MT geometry dominated deposition. In vitro tests with the SMI at 15-45 L/min underestimated MT deposition and overestimated lung deposition with all MT models except OPCs, although testing at higher flow rates showed good agreement with in vivo results. Conclusions: While realistic in vitro tests may produce results that correspond to drug deposition in vivo, MT model selection was most important for the MDI and SMI, but much less important than inhalation strength for the DPI.

Keywords: IVIVC; In vitro in vivo correlations; lung dose; mouth–throat; realistic test methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources