Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Published Erratum
. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0199075.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199075. eCollection 2018.

Correction: Development of Risk Score for Predicting 3-Year Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study

Akiko Nanri, Tohru Nakagawa, Keisuke Kuwahara, Shuichiro Yamamoto, Toru Honda, Hiroko Okazaki, Akihiko Uehara, Makoto Yamamoto, Toshiaki Miyamoto, Takeshi Kochi, Masafumi Eguchi, Taizo Murakami, Chii Shimizu, Makiko Shimizu, Kentaro Tomita, Satsue Nagahama, Teppei Imai, Akiko Nishihara, Naoko Sasaki, Ai Hori, Nobuaki Sakamoto, Chihiro Nishiura, Takafumi Totsuzaki, Noritada Kato, Kenji Fukasawa, Huanhuan Hu, Shamima Akter, Kayo Kurotani, Isamu Kabe, Tetsuya Mizoue, Tomofumi Sone, Seitaro Dohi; Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study Group
Published Erratum

Correction: Development of Risk Score for Predicting 3-Year Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study

Akiko Nanri et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142779.].

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for each risk score model in predicting type 2 diabetes.
Abbreviation: FPG, fasting plasma glucose. In the derivation cohort, the area under the ROC (95% confidence interval) were 0.717 (0.703–0.731) for the non-invasive model, 0.843 (0.832–0.853) for the model including FPG, 0.827 (0.816–0.838) for the model including HbA1c, and 0.893 (0.883–0.902) for the model including both FPG and HbA1c. In the validation cohort, the corresponding value were 0.734 (0.715–0.753) for the non-invasive model, 0.835 (0.820–0.851) for the model including FPG, 0.819 (0.803–0.835) for the model including HbA1c, and 0.882 (0.868–0.895) for the model including both FPG and HbA1c.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Erratum for

References

    1. Nanri A, Nakagawa T, Kuwahara K, Yamamoto S, Honda T, Okazaki H, et al. (2015) Development of Risk Score for Predicting 3-Year Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0142779 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142779 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources