Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):709.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5573-8.

Washing with hope: evidence of improved handwashing among children in South Africa from a pilot study of a novel soap technology

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Washing with hope: evidence of improved handwashing among children in South Africa from a pilot study of a novel soap technology

Justine Burns et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: While regular handwashing effectively reduces communicable disease incidence and related child mortality, instilling a habit of regular handwashing in young children continues to be a challenging task, especially in developing country contexts. This randomised controlled pilot study assessed the effect of a novel handwashing intervention - a bi-monthly delivery of a colourful, translucent bar of soap with a toy embedded in its centre (HOPE SOAP©) - on children's handwashing behaviour and health outcomes.

Methods: Between September and December 2014, 203 households in an impoverished community in Cape Town, South Africa, were randomised (1:1) to the control group or to receive HOPE SOAP©. Of all children (N = 287) aged 3-9 years and not enrolled in early childhood development programmes, 153 residing in intervention households received a bar of HOPE SOAP© every two weeks (total of 4 bars). Children in control households received a colourful, translucent bar of soap of equal size to HOPE SOAP©, with a toy alongside it. Two 'snack tests' (children were offered crackers and jam) were used to provide objective observational measures of handwashing. Through baseline and endline surveys, data were collected from caregivers on the frequency (scale of 1-10) of handwashing by children after using the toilet and before meals, and on soap-use during handwashing. Data on 14 illnesses/symptoms of illness experienced by children in the two weeks preceding the surveys were collected. Multivariable Ordinary Least Squares regression analyses were used to assess the intervention effect on handwashing behaviours and health outcomes.

Results: At endline, HOPE SOAP© children were directly observed as being more likely to wash their hands unprompted at both snack tests (49% vs 39%, β: 0.10, p = 0.27). They were more likely to score ≥8/10 for using soap when washing their hands (β: 0.14, p = 0.011). HOPE SOAP© children, in general, had better health outcomes, and those who used the soap as intended, and did not cheat to remove the toy from the soap, were less likely to have been ill (β: - 0.15, p = 0.049).

Conclusions: Results point towards HOPE SOAP© being an effective intervention to improve handwashing among children. Further research on this novel handwashing intervention is warranted.

Trial registration: NCT03280771 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ) retrospectively registered on 8 September 2017.

Keywords: Behavioural economics; Childhood health; Development economics; Habit formation; Handwashing intervention; Pilot randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was approved by the Ethics in Research Committee in the Faculty of Commerce at the University of Cape Town (Application number 1952). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written consent for the surveys was obtained from all respondents. No minors were interviewed during the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of intervention and data collection for the HOPE SOAP© pilot study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Observations of handwashing among children during the snack tests
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Child handwashing behaviour as reported by caregivers: a handwashing after using the toilet; b handwashing before meals; c soap-use during handwashing

References

    1. Aiello AE, Coulborn RM, Perez V, Larson EL. Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1372–1381. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124610. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Lerberghe W, Manuel A, Matthews Z, Cathy W. The World Health Report 2005: Make every mother and child count. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.
    1. Almond D, Currie J. Human capital development before age five. NBER Working Paper Series. 2011;15827
    1. Currie J, Stabile M, Manivong P, Roos LL. Child Health and Young adult outcomes. J Hum Resour. 2010;45:517–548.
    1. Case A, Paxson C. Early life health and cognitive function in old age. Am Econ Rev. 2009;99:104–109. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources