Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0.

Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review

Diane O'Doherty  1 , Marie Dromey  2 , Justan Lougheed  3 , Ailish Hannigan  3 , Jason Last  4 , Deirdre McGrath  3
Affiliations
Review

Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review

Diane O'Doherty et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to review the literature on known barriers and solutions that face educators when developing and implementing online learning programs for medical students and postgraduate trainees.

Methods: An integrative review was conducted over a three-month period by an inter-institutional research team. The search included ScienceDirect, Scopus, BioMedical, PubMed, Medline (EBSCO & Ovid), ERIC, LISA, EBSCO, Google Scholar, ProQuest A&I, ProQuest UK & Ireland, UL Institutional Repository (IR), UCDIR and the All Aboard Report. Search terms included online learning, medical educators, development, barriers, solutions and digital literacy. The search was carried out by two reviewers. Titles and abstracts were screened independently and reviewed with inclusion/exclusion criteria. A consensus was drawn on which articles were included. Data appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist and NHMRC Appraisal Evidence Matrix. Data extraction was completed using the Cochrane Data Extraction Form and a modified extraction tool.

Results: Of the 3101 abstracts identified from the search, ten full-text papers met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was completed on seven papers of high methodological quality and on three lower quality papers. Findings suggest that the key barriers which affect the development and implementation of online learning in medical education include time constraints, poor technical skills, inadequate infrastructure, absence of institutional strategies and support and negative attitudes of all involved. Solutions to these include improved educator skills, incentives and reward for the time involved with development and delivery of online content, improved institutional strategies and support and positive attitude amongst all those involved in the development and delivery of online content.

Conclusion: This review has identified barriers and solutions amongst medical educators to the implementation of online learning in medical education. Results can be used to inform institutional and educator practice in the development of further online learning.

Keywords: Barriers; E-learning; Medical education; Medical faculty; Online learning; Solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

  1. Diane O Doherty is a research assistant based in the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick.

  2. Marie Dromey is a graduate student studying medicine, and a researcher based in UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin.

  3. Justan Lougheed is a third year medical student and researcher based in the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick.

  4. Professor Ailish Hannigan is Associate Professor of Biomedical Statistics in the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick.

  5. Professor Jason Last is Dean of Students at University College Dublin.

  6. Professor Deirdre McGrath is Director of Education in the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Core themes identified through the coding process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Albarrak A. Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts [Internet]. 1st ed. Formatex Research Center; 2011 [cited 16 Aug 2016]. Available from: http://www.formatex.info/ict/book/147-153.pdf
    1. Pettersson F, Olofsson A. Implementing distance teaching at a large scale in medical education: a struggle between dominant and non-dominant teaching activities. Educ Doc Inf s. 2015;20:359–380.
    1. Shachar M, Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: a meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning [Internet]. 2003 [cited 12 Aug 2016]; Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/704
    1. Howlett D, Vincent T, Gainsborough N, Fairclough J, Taylor N, Vincent R. Integration of a case-based online module into an undergraduate curriculum: what is involved and what is effective? e-Learning. 2009;6(4):372–384.
    1. Mooney G, Bligh J. Information technology in medical education: current and future applications. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73(865):701–704. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.73.865.701. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources