Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jun 8;6(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0479-3.

Meta-analysis of human genome-microbiome association studies: the MiBioGen consortium initiative

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of human genome-microbiome association studies: the MiBioGen consortium initiative

Jun Wang et al. Microbiome. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, human microbiota, especially gut microbiota, have emerged as an important yet complex trait influencing human metabolism, immunology, and diseases. Many studies are investigating the forces underlying the observed variation, including the human genetic variants that shape human microbiota. Several preliminary genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been completed, but more are necessary to achieve a fuller picture.

Results: Here, we announce the MiBioGen consortium initiative, which has assembled 18 population-level cohorts and some 19,000 participants. Its aim is to generate new knowledge for the rapidly developing field of microbiota research. Each cohort has surveyed the gut microbiome via 16S rRNA sequencing and genotyped their participants with full-genome SNP arrays. We have standardized the analytical pipelines for both the microbiota phenotypes and genotypes, and all the data have been processed using identical approaches. Our analysis of microbiome composition shows that we can reduce the potential artifacts introduced by technical differences in generating microbiota data. We are now in the process of benchmarking the association tests and performing meta-analyses of genome-wide associations. All pipeline and summary statistics results will be shared using public data repositories.

Conclusion: We present the largest consortium to date devoted to microbiota-GWAS. We have adapted our analytical pipelines to suit multi-cohort analyses and expect to gain insight into host-microbiota cross-talk at the genome-wide level. And, as an open consortium, we invite more cohorts to join us (by contacting one of the corresponding authors) and to follow the analytical pipeline we have developed.

Keywords: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS); Gut microbiome; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent to participate were acquired by each cohort, according to their local regulations and institute requirements.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was acquired by each cohort, according to their local regulations and institute requirements.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of genome-wide significant loci discovered in four recent GWAS studies [–12]. For simplicity, only the regions harboring a coding gene are shown, and for Wang et al. [14], the list was further refined to genes implicated in previous mouse QTL studies and to additional loci identified by an improved method (shown in gray, Rühlemann et al. Gut microbes, 2017). So far, the only overlap found in the three studies is the SLIT3 locus, although two studies reported two SNPs not in linkage disequilibrium. The LCT locus was not significant in the initial analysis using an additive model, but analyzing functional SNPs in the recessive model identified a significant association for LCT in the Dutch cohort [15]

Similar articles

  • Genome-wide associations of human gut microbiome variation and implications for causal inference analyses.
    Hughes DA, Bacigalupe R, Wang J, Rühlemann MC, Tito RY, Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Henckaerts L, Rymenans L, Verspecht C, Ring S, Franke A, Wade KH, Timpson NJ, Raes J. Hughes DA, et al. Nat Microbiol. 2020 Sep;5(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0743-8. Epub 2020 Jun 22. Nat Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32572223 Free PMC article.
  • A gene co-association network regulating gut microbial communities in a Duroc pig population.
    Reverter A, Ballester M, Alexandre PA, Mármol-Sánchez E, Dalmau A, Quintanilla R, Ramayo-Caldas Y. Reverter A, et al. Microbiome. 2021 Feb 21;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00994-8. Microbiome. 2021. PMID: 33612109 Free PMC article.
  • Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition.
    Kurilshikov A, Medina-Gomez C, Bacigalupe R, Radjabzadeh D, Wang J, Demirkan A, Le Roy CI, Raygoza Garay JA, Finnicum CT, Liu X, Zhernakova DV, Bonder MJ, Hansen TH, Frost F, Rühlemann MC, Turpin W, Moon JY, Kim HN, Lüll K, Barkan E, Shah SA, Fornage M, Szopinska-Tokov J, Wallen ZD, Borisevich D, Agreus L, Andreasson A, Bang C, Bedrani L, Bell JT, Bisgaard H, Boehnke M, Boomsma DI, Burk RD, Claringbould A, Croitoru K, Davies GE, van Duijn CM, Duijts L, Falony G, Fu J, van der Graaf A, Hansen T, Homuth G, Hughes DA, Ijzerman RG, Jackson MA, Jaddoe VWV, Joossens M, Jørgensen T, Keszthelyi D, Knight R, Laakso M, Laudes M, Launer LJ, Lieb W, Lusis AJ, Masclee AAM, Moll HA, Mujagic Z, Qibin Q, Rothschild D, Shin H, Sørensen SJ, Steves CJ, Thorsen J, Timpson NJ, Tito RY, Vieira-Silva S, Völker U, Völzke H, Võsa U, Wade KH, Walter S, Watanabe K, Weiss S, Weiss FU, Weissbrod O, Westra HJ, Willemsen G, Payami H, Jonkers DMAE, Arias Vasquez A, de Geus EJC, Meyer KA, Stokholm J, Segal E, Org E, Wijmenga C, Kim HL, Kaplan RC, Spector TD, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F, Franke A, Lerch MM, Franke L, Sanna S, D'Amato M, Pedersen O, Paterson AD, Kraaij R, Raes J, Zhernakova A. Kurilshikov A, et al. Nat Genet. 2021 Feb;53(2):156-165. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00763-1. Epub 2021 Jan 18. Nat Genet. 2021. PMID: 33462485 Free PMC article.
  • Host genetics and microbiome associations through the lens of genome wide association studies.
    Weissbrod O, Rothschild D, Barkan E, Segal E. Weissbrod O, et al. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018 Aug;44:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 14. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29909175 Review.
  • Taxonomic composition and variation in the gut microbiota of laboratory mice.
    Yang J, Chun J. Yang J, et al. Mamm Genome. 2021 Aug;32(4):297-310. doi: 10.1007/s00335-021-09871-7. Epub 2021 Apr 24. Mamm Genome. 2021. PMID: 33893864 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Qin J, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nat. 2012;490:55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature11450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yatsunenko YT, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nat. 2012;486:222–227. doi: 10.1038/nature11053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh PJ, et al. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–810. doi: 10.1038/nature06244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommer F, et al. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nature reviews Microbiol. 2017;15:630–638. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.58. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486:215–221. doi: 10.1038/nature11209. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances