Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 4;5(1):18.
doi: 10.5334/egems.216.

Overcoming Barriers to Experience Benefits: A Qualitative Analysis of Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange Implementation in Local Health Departments

Affiliations

Overcoming Barriers to Experience Benefits: A Qualitative Analysis of Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange Implementation in Local Health Departments

Karmen S Williams et al. EGEMS (Wash DC). .

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) are changing surveillance and analytic operations within local health departments (LHDs) across the United States. The objective of this study was to analyze the status, benefits, barriers, and ways of overcoming challenges in the implementation of EHRs and HIEs in LHDs.

Methods: This study employed a mixed methods approach, first using the 2013 National Profile of LHDs survey to ascertain the status of EHR and HIE implementation across the US, as well as to aid in selection of respondents for the second, interview-based part of project. Next, forty-nine key-informant interviews of local health department staff were conducted. Data were coded thematically and independently by two researchers. Coding was compared and re-coded using the consensus definitions.

Results: Twenty-three percent of LHDs nationwide are using EHRs and 14 percent are using HIEs. The most frequently mentioned benefits for implementation were identified as care coordination, retrieval or managing information, and the ability to track outcomes of care. A few mentioned barriers included financial resources, resistance to change, and IT related issues during implementation.

Discussion: Despite financial, technical capacity, and operational constraints, leaders interviewed as part of this project were optimistic about the future of EHRs in local health departments. Recent policy changes and accreditation have implications of improving processes to affect populations served.

Conclusions: Overcoming the challenges in implementing EHRs can result in increased efficiencies in surveillance and higher quality patient care and tracking. However, significant opportunity cost does exist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of LHDs by Implementation Activity Level of EHRs and HIEs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheatham M. Informatics works in local health departments. NAACHO Exchange. 2013; 12(1), 1–2. [Cited 2015 Jul 8]. Available from: http://eweb.naccho.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?WebCode=proddetailadd&ivd_p...
    1. Fernandez-Aleman J, Carrion Senor I, Angel Oliver Lozoya P, Toval A. Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review. J Biomed Informatics. 2013; 46; 541–562. - PubMed
    1. Birkhead G, Klompas M, Shah N. Uses of electronic health records for public health surveillance to advance public health. Ann Rev Public Health. 2015; 36: 345–359. - PubMed
    1. Dixon BE, Gibson PJ, Frederickson Comer K, Rosenman M. Measuring Population Health Using Electronic Health Records: Exploring Biases and Representativeness in a Community Health Information Exchange. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:1009. - PubMed
    1. Diez Roux AV, Katz M, Crews DC, Ross D, Adler N. Social and Behavioral Information in Electronic Health Records: New Opportunities for Medicine and Public Health. Am J Prev Med. 2015. December; 49(6):980–983. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.027 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources