Overcoming Barriers to Experience Benefits: A Qualitative Analysis of Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange Implementation in Local Health Departments
- PMID: 29881738
- PMCID: PMC5983057
- DOI: 10.5334/egems.216
Overcoming Barriers to Experience Benefits: A Qualitative Analysis of Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange Implementation in Local Health Departments
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) are changing surveillance and analytic operations within local health departments (LHDs) across the United States. The objective of this study was to analyze the status, benefits, barriers, and ways of overcoming challenges in the implementation of EHRs and HIEs in LHDs.
Methods: This study employed a mixed methods approach, first using the 2013 National Profile of LHDs survey to ascertain the status of EHR and HIE implementation across the US, as well as to aid in selection of respondents for the second, interview-based part of project. Next, forty-nine key-informant interviews of local health department staff were conducted. Data were coded thematically and independently by two researchers. Coding was compared and re-coded using the consensus definitions.
Results: Twenty-three percent of LHDs nationwide are using EHRs and 14 percent are using HIEs. The most frequently mentioned benefits for implementation were identified as care coordination, retrieval or managing information, and the ability to track outcomes of care. A few mentioned barriers included financial resources, resistance to change, and IT related issues during implementation.
Discussion: Despite financial, technical capacity, and operational constraints, leaders interviewed as part of this project were optimistic about the future of EHRs in local health departments. Recent policy changes and accreditation have implications of improving processes to affect populations served.
Conclusions: Overcoming the challenges in implementing EHRs can result in increased efficiencies in surveillance and higher quality patient care and tracking. However, significant opportunity cost does exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use in Local Health Departments: Updates From the 2015 NACCHO Informatics Assessment Survey.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22 Suppl 6, Public Health Informatics(Suppl 6):S27-S33. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000460. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016. PMID: 27684614 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Data Systems to Support Public Health Practice: A National Survey of Software and Storage Systems Among Local Health Departments.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22 Suppl 6, Public Health Informatics(Suppl 6):S18-S26. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000443. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016. PMID: 27684613 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring facilitators of the implementation of electronic health records in Saudi Arabia.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02072-5. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022. PMID: 36476224 Free PMC article.
-
Findings from the 2022 Yearbook Section on Health Information Exchange.Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):215-218. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742534. Epub 2022 Dec 4. Yearb Med Inform. 2022. PMID: 36463880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health information exchanges--Unfulfilled promise as a data source for clinical research.Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11. Int J Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 26806706 Review.
Cited by
-
Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0952-3. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019. PMID: 31727063 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Centered Data Home: A Path Towards National Interoperability.Front Digit Health. 2022 Jul 13;4:887015. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.887015. eCollection 2022. Front Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 35911616 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study.JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 1;8(12):e29243. doi: 10.2196/29243. JMIR Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 34855615 Free PMC article.
-
Needs and Perspectives of Cancer Center Stakeholders for Access to Patient Values in the Electronic Health Record.JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1524-e1536. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00644. Epub 2021 Feb 8. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021. PMID: 33555928 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitator and Barrier to Health Information System Use from Health Professionals Perspective: A Scoping Review.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 7;18:3901-3920. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S515295. eCollection 2025. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025. PMID: 40657566 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cheatham M. Informatics works in local health departments. NAACHO Exchange. 2013; 12(1), 1–2. [Cited 2015 Jul 8]. Available from: http://eweb.naccho.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?WebCode=proddetailadd&ivd_p...
-
- Fernandez-Aleman J, Carrion Senor I, Angel Oliver Lozoya P, Toval A. Security and privacy in electronic health records: A systematic literature review. J Biomed Informatics. 2013; 46; 541–562. - PubMed
-
- Birkhead G, Klompas M, Shah N. Uses of electronic health records for public health surveillance to advance public health. Ann Rev Public Health. 2015; 36: 345–359. - PubMed
-
- Dixon BE, Gibson PJ, Frederickson Comer K, Rosenman M. Measuring Population Health Using Electronic Health Records: Exploring Biases and Representativeness in a Community Health Information Exchange. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:1009. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources