Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;98(6_Suppl):1-49.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0083.

Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group

Affiliations

Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group

Stephanie James et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Gene drive technology offers the promise for a high-impact, cost-effective, and durable method to control malaria transmission that would make a significant contribution to elimination. Gene drive systems, such as those based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein, have the potential to spread beneficial traits through interbreeding populations of malaria mosquitoes. However, the characteristics of this technology have raised concerns that necessitate careful consideration of the product development pathway. A multidisciplinary working group considered the implications of low-threshold gene drive systems on the development pathway described in the World Health Organization Guidance Framework for testing genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes, focusing on reduction of malaria transmission by Anopheles gambiae s.l. mosquitoes in Africa as a case study. The group developed recommendations for the safe and ethical testing of gene drive mosquitoes, drawing on prior experience with other vector control tools, GM organisms, and biocontrol agents. These recommendations are organized according to a testing plan that seeks to maximize safety by incrementally increasing the degree of human and environmental exposure to the investigational product. As with biocontrol agents, emphasis is placed on safety evaluation at the end of physically confined laboratory testing as a major decision point for whether to enter field testing. Progression through the testing pathway is based on fulfillment of safety and efficacy criteria, and is subject to regulatory and ethical approvals, as well as social acceptance. The working group identified several resources that were considered important to support responsible field testing of gene drive mosquitoes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spread of novel traits by gene drive vs. Mendelian inheritance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of population replacement (A) and population suppression (B) strategies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pathway to deployment of gene drive mosquitoes.

References

    1. Curtis CF, Graves PM, 1988. Methods for replacement of malaria vector populations. J Trop Med Hyg 91: 43–48. - PubMed
    1. Beaty BJ, Prager DJ, James AA, Jacobs-Lorena M, Miller LH, Law JH, Collins FH, Kafatos FC, 2009. From Tucson to genomics and transgenics: the vector biology network and the emergence of modern vector biology. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burt A, 2014. Heritable strategies for controlling insect vectors of disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369: 20130432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adelman ZN, 2015. Genetic Control of Malaria and Dengue Academic Press. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
    1. Sinkins SP, Gould F, 2006. Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors. Nat Rev Genet 7: 427–435. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms