Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 6;15(6):1190.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061190.

Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review

Kim A G J Romijnders et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the attractiveness of e-cigarettes for several different groups. For this purpose, perceptions of and reasons for e-cigarette use were systematically reviewed as reported by e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, dual users, and non-users, among both adults and youth. MEDLINE® and Scopus were used to search for relevant articles, and references of included studies were also investigated. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts independently, blinded to authors and journal titles (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.83), resulting in 72 eligible articles. Risk perceptions, perceived benefits, and reasons for e-cigarette use were categorized in themes and sub-themes. Risk perceptions included harmfulness in general, and specific health risks. Perceived benefits included improved taste and smell, and safety for bystanders. Reasons for use included (health) benefits, curiosity, smoking cessation, and friends using e-cigarettes. The findings highlight that there is a variety of perceptions and reasons mentioned by adult and youth e-cigarette users, cigarette smokers, dual users, and non-users. As such, this overview provides valuable information for scientists, public health professionals, behavior change experts, and regulators to improve future research, risk communication, and possibilities to effectively regulate e-cigarettes.

Keywords: adults; dual use; electronic cigarette; perceptions; reasons; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. (a) Identification contains all records identified during the search. (b) Screening lists all reasons why articles were excluded based on title and abstract. (c) Eligibility records all the records available for full-text review. (d) Included reports all exclusion criteria used during full-text review.

References

    1. World Health Organization Tobacco Free Initiative (TFI) [(accessed on 12 July 2017)]; Available online: http://www.who.int/tobacco/communications/statements/eletronic_cigarette...
    1. Grana R., Benowitz N., Glantz S.A. E-cigarettes: A scientific review. Circulation. 2014;129:1972–1986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007667. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glasser A.M., Collins L., Pearson J.L., Abudayyeh H., Niaura R.S., Abrams D.B., Villanti A.C. Overview of electronic nicotine delivery systems: A systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017;52:e33–e66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hajek P., Etter J.F., Benowitz N., Eissenberg T., McRobbie H. Electronic cigarettes: Review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit. Addiction. 2014;109:1801–1810. doi: 10.1111/add.12659. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visser W., Geraets L., Klerx W., Hernandez L., Croes E., Schwillens P., Cremers H., Bos P., Talhout R. The Health Risks of E-Cigarette Use. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); Bilthoven, The Netherlands: 2015. pp. 13–16.

Publication types

MeSH terms