Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 8;13(6):e0198656.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198656. eCollection 2018.

An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory

Affiliations

An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory

Nichol Castro et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In the Speech-to-Song Illusion, repetition of a spoken phrase results in it being perceived as if it were sung. Although a number of previous studies have examined which characteristics of the stimulus will produce the illusion, there is, until now, no description of the cognitive mechanism that underlies the illusion. We suggest that the processes found in Node Structure Theory that are used to explain normal language processing as well as other auditory illusions might also account for the Speech-to-Song Illusion. In six experiments we tested whether the satiation of lexical nodes, but continued priming of syllable nodes may lead to the Speech-to-Song Illusion. The results of these experiments provide evidence for the role of priming, activation, and satiation as described in Node Structure Theory as an explanation of the Speech-to-Song Illusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Depiction of the word frisbee according to Node Structure Theory.
Adapted from Fig 1 in [17]. A simplified depiction of the network connections for the word frisbee, including higher-level sentential connections and lower-level phonological connections.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Speech-to-Song ratings of dense and sparse word-lists dependent on repetition condition.
Ratings were made on a scale from 1 (sounds like speech) to 5 (sounds like song) for dense and sparse word-lists in three repetition conditions (no repetition, repetition with pauses, and repetition without pauses). Mean ratings for each condition are listed above each column, with whiskers representing standard error of the mean.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Speech-to-Song ratings of low and high phonotactic probability word-lists dependent on repetition condition.
Ratings were made on a scale from 1 (sounds like speech) to 5 (sounds like song) for low and high phonotactic probability word-lists with and without repetition. Mean ratings for each condition are listed above each column, with whiskers representing standard error of the mean.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Plot of Speech-to-Song ratings dependent on the number of words per list.
Spaghetti plot highlights the quadratic effect of the number of words on Speech-to-Song ratings for each participant. Blue lines represent each individual’s trajectory with the black line representing the average of all individuals.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Plot of Speech-to-Song ratings dependent on the number of syllables per list.
Spaghetti plot highlights the linear effect of the number of syllables on Speech-to-Song ratings for each participant. Blue lines represent each individual’s trajectory with the black line representing the average of all individuals.

References

    1. Gregory R. L. (1968). Perceptual illusions and brain models. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 171, 279–296. - PubMed
    1. Coren S., & Girgus J. S., (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    1. Jack B.N., O’Shea R.P., Cottrell D. & Ritter W. (2013). Does the ventriloquist illusion assist selective listening? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1496–1502. doi: 10.1037/a0033594 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choe C.S., Welch R.B., Gilford R.M. & Juola J.F. (1975). The "ventriloquist effect": Visual discrimination or response bias? Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 55–60.
    1. McGurk H. & MacDonald J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources